
Journal Interrobang's Journal: Cunnilingus Contest Logistics (Warning: R-Rated) 18
A friend of mine said on LiveJournal that s/he wished there were a cunnilingus contest to enter, because "Sweet words are darned nice, but I want a trophy!"
Glenn admits that the judging would be a "lengthy process," but I submit it would be a logistical nightmare:
1) First of all, who gets to enter? Males? Females? Some of each? (And where does someone transgendered like Glenn fit into that spectrum precisely? Do we judge the Glenn by the Glenn's chromosomes, or by clothing?) Judging is, admittedly, an easier problem from that standpoint: Only those of them with the requisite equipment to receive cunnilingus can judge.
Note: The first person who makes one of those terribly offensive "lesbian trapped in a man's body" jokes will be drug out in the street and shot like a dog.
2) By what criteria do we judge cunnilingus? The whole "good/bad sex" continuum is so bloody subjective. I mean, what works for me I know from conversations with past/current lovers doesn't work for other women, and vice versa.
3) Likewise, whom do we select from our eligible pool of female judges? Straight females, bi females, lesbian females? Some of each? If we have a mix of sexes in the contestants, and a mix of orientations among the judges, who gets to lick whom, and how do we keep track of the scoring (!!) that way?
4) Do we give the contestants and/or judges a "bye" or two, so that we avoid the problem of clashing orientations and/or the old "he/she just doesn't do it for me" problem? How do we deal with differing standards of attractiveness among the judges and contestants?
5) How do we structure the tourney? As a sort of round-robin (albeit with a bye or two), so that just about everyone judging gets licked by just about everyone else? Do we arrange a blind licking? (If so, how does the contestant get horny enough to enjoy a blind licking?) How do we deal with people who may have a predisposition to (serial) monogamy (whether they know it or not) and therefore may bias the results?
6) How do we arrange and tabulate the scores? Perhaps by division (Male/Female, Male-on-Female, Female-on-Female)? Collectively, so the person who gets the highest total ratings (in their division?) gets the (division) title? Should we just grade everyone like English essays and leave it at that?
7) Finally, how do we ensure everything is safe, sane, and consensual for all the participants? Do we therefore mandate the use of dental dams (and thereby diminish a lot of the sensations for both licker and lickee -- bleah, latex tastes ick)? Do we mandate pre-screening for STDs, thereby causing some people some expense/inconvenience for blood tests and the like? And what about physical safety? How do we make sure no one gets too rough, or no one hits a wrong nerve somewhere and gets (accidentally or on purpose) kicked in the throat or something (hey, it happened to me once)?
8) Also, where do we situate the contest? What venue? (A motel, perhaps? Pennsic??) Do we charge admission and allow the public to watch? (I would personally be against this option, but that's me.) How do we account for the fact that participants may have different times of the day they're most interested in performing those sorts of activities? Do we send out packages to the press? Do we sell the film rights to some reputable porno house (there are a few) somewhere (maybe Andrew Blake)? Can we get corporate sponsorships? Should we charge a (cough) entry fee? Can I stop laughing long enough to finish typing this?
Anyway, I'm (cough) opening this one to debate. Any questions answered, hashed out, raised, et cetera, good. Then I'll probably mail the link to Glenn and tell Glenn to read the discussion and get planning... :evilgrin:
Glenn admits that the judging would be a "lengthy process," but I submit it would be a logistical nightmare:
1) First of all, who gets to enter? Males? Females? Some of each? (And where does someone transgendered like Glenn fit into that spectrum precisely? Do we judge the Glenn by the Glenn's chromosomes, or by clothing?) Judging is, admittedly, an easier problem from that standpoint: Only those of them with the requisite equipment to receive cunnilingus can judge.
Note: The first person who makes one of those terribly offensive "lesbian trapped in a man's body" jokes will be drug out in the street and shot like a dog.
2) By what criteria do we judge cunnilingus? The whole "good/bad sex" continuum is so bloody subjective. I mean, what works for me I know from conversations with past/current lovers doesn't work for other women, and vice versa.
3) Likewise, whom do we select from our eligible pool of female judges? Straight females, bi females, lesbian females? Some of each? If we have a mix of sexes in the contestants, and a mix of orientations among the judges, who gets to lick whom, and how do we keep track of the scoring (!!) that way?
4) Do we give the contestants and/or judges a "bye" or two, so that we avoid the problem of clashing orientations and/or the old "he/she just doesn't do it for me" problem? How do we deal with differing standards of attractiveness among the judges and contestants?
5) How do we structure the tourney? As a sort of round-robin (albeit with a bye or two), so that just about everyone judging gets licked by just about everyone else? Do we arrange a blind licking? (If so, how does the contestant get horny enough to enjoy a blind licking?) How do we deal with people who may have a predisposition to (serial) monogamy (whether they know it or not) and therefore may bias the results?
6) How do we arrange and tabulate the scores? Perhaps by division (Male/Female, Male-on-Female, Female-on-Female)? Collectively, so the person who gets the highest total ratings (in their division?) gets the (division) title? Should we just grade everyone like English essays and leave it at that?
7) Finally, how do we ensure everything is safe, sane, and consensual for all the participants? Do we therefore mandate the use of dental dams (and thereby diminish a lot of the sensations for both licker and lickee -- bleah, latex tastes ick)? Do we mandate pre-screening for STDs, thereby causing some people some expense/inconvenience for blood tests and the like? And what about physical safety? How do we make sure no one gets too rough, or no one hits a wrong nerve somewhere and gets (accidentally or on purpose) kicked in the throat or something (hey, it happened to me once)?
8) Also, where do we situate the contest? What venue? (A motel, perhaps? Pennsic??) Do we charge admission and allow the public to watch? (I would personally be against this option, but that's me.) How do we account for the fact that participants may have different times of the day they're most interested in performing those sorts of activities? Do we send out packages to the press? Do we sell the film rights to some reputable porno house (there are a few) somewhere (maybe Andrew Blake)? Can we get corporate sponsorships? Should we charge a (cough) entry fee? Can I stop laughing long enough to finish typing this?
Anyway, I'm (cough) opening this one to debate. Any questions answered, hashed out, raised, et cetera, good. Then I'll probably mail the link to Glenn and tell Glenn to read the discussion and get planning...
sorry (Score:1)
Too bad! (Score:2)
Alas, my fiance probably wouldn't let me judge...
Re:Too bad! (Score:1)
That's part of my secret technique;)
Trapped lesbians (Score:2)
Just curious... which jokes are they? Only asking because I happen to know a couple of them. They're both now post-op, and happily living together in gender-confused bliss :-)
Well, I'm glad for *them*... (Score:2)
I doubt any of my readers, sensitive and intelligent bunch that you are, would actually
Re:Well, I'm glad for *them*... (Score:2)
Well, I haven't actually said it myself, but a girl I knew once tried to drag me away saying "Come on - I know you are a lesbian trapped in a man's body - let's go play"... Naturally I resisted her urgings.
(Since when did the "Slow Down Cowboy" page display a preview of your comment with an edit box? That's almost like a useful feature - someone musta slipped
Slow Down Cowboy! (Score:2)
Re:Well, I'm glad for *them*... (Score:2)
I think Pennsic would be an excellent place to have this, seeing as I will be at Pennsic again. I never did get to meet you at the last one. I meant to, but I got kinda "pre-occupied" with a girl from the camp next door.
Dental dams (Score:2)
I've never really understood that. I mean, even "unprotected" cunnilingus is safer than pentirative sex with a condom, yet people are quite prepared to do the latter. What's the deal with dental dams?
Re:Dental dams (Score:2)
another problem (Score:2)
Re:another problem (Score:2)
Well, we could just make sure... (Score:2)
Dental dams??? (Score:2)
I can't imagine that I'd enjoy licking a piece of latex, anymore than I'd enjoy getting fellatio while wearing a condom (although it *does* sound kind of kinky).
Quite genuinely... (Score:2)
Having said that, for some hours after, my tongue was very sore - and I was deeply concerned about my breath.
But I suspect this would all be down to eating a rather hot pie earlier in the day (again, not in the naughty sense (whatever that would be exactly)) and probably burning my tongue a bit.
As for the competition, hmm, it sounds like your friend's serious about this, not just joking around then? Well, here's my thou
DAMN! I forgot... (Score:2)
I probably hadn't read it closely enough originally as I think I didn't get it then (I am officially dim). Perhaps it works better if you hear/imagine it in certain accents (eg- not mine).
Be Careful What You Wish For (Score:1)