Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:A gun is a weapon first and foremost (Score 1) 544

by Imagix (#43737515) Attached to: A Computer-based Smart Rifle With Incredible Accuracy, Now On Sale

There is a reason guns have targeting/tracking systems when used in anger

Sure. But I know very few people who are "angry" at the deer that they are planning on having for dinner. (I'm excluding military applications for this)

Sometimes the point it just to hit the target and it doesn't matter who gets credit for the aiming.

Um, if the point isn't to demonstrate/exercise your skills in the field, why not go buy your game meat from the store?

Comment: Re:Dated, old, irrelevant to many except the dieha (Score 2) 191

by Imagix (#43634881) Attached to: Debian 7.0 ("Wheezy") Released

Im sorry but the concept of since its old its very stable is non-sense

Bad premise. This appears to imply that the goal is to run old stuff. The concept of "Since it has been tested well, it's very stable" is where Debian is. New kernel means everything needs retesting. Are you volunteering the time and equipment to run that kind of testing? And it's not just the kernel that needs retesting, it's all of the rest of the packages. (I haven't checked to see if they want to ensure that the kernel is the same rev on all platforms as well...)

Debian could ship a system with kernel 3.8 and the newer stuff that most distros use and be just as stable

Maybe. But without the testing to back it up, that's too much of a risk. Now that Debian 7 has been released, I kinda expect the latest kernel to be making its way into experimental and then unstable soon. You can run a mixed branch installation should you so choose. Use stable for most everything, and bring Iceweasel in from testing (or even unstable).

Comment: Re:Ruining it for everyone (Score 5, Interesting) 288

by Imagix (#43384225) Attached to: Researcher Evan Booth: How To Weaponize Tax-Free Airport Goods
True story: Passing security, my wife had her nail clippers confiscated. As soon as we cleared security, we walked into one of the shops and bought another pair of nail clippers. What was the point of seizing them at security? Equally true story: we bought water in the security area in our originating airport. Transferred planes in London, and they seized the water. BTW: do they somehow scan all of the merchandise that was brought into the secured area, like the bottled water that you can't bring across security?

Comment: Re:Not true. (Score 1) 984

by Imagix (#43139903) Attached to: Ohio Judge Rules Speed Cameras Are a Scam

How is anyone supposed to see stoplights blocks away?

They're usually mounted up some 10-20' in the air. Makes them much easier to see from a distance.

Around a curve?

Around here, there's slower speed limits, a sign warning about a streetlight around the corner, an earlier blinking sign that turns on when that light goes yellow, or some combination of the three.

Over a hill?

Same as above.

In a complicated intersection with turn arrows?

What about them? You look at the lights.

You're speaking nonsense that has nothing to do with traffic law or safety and just sounds like old wives' tales being handed down. You should be keeping your eyes on the conditions around you, not on stoplights 2/10 of a mile away.

And you sound like you're attempting to justify your own inattention to the road. (oh look, I can throw around ad hominem attacks that do nothing for the argument too.) You should be keeping your eyes on the conditions around you, which _includes_ the next steet lights coming up (which may include: "Yep, next street lights are 2 miles away. They won't affect me for a while, I'll pay attention to them again when I'm closer."), the signage, the traffic around you, the potential for pedestrians to emerge from between parked cars, the fact that it just started raining, and all of the million other things that could go wrong. Don't develop tunnel vision where you can only see 30' in front of you.

Comment: Re:Not true. (Score 1) 984

by Imagix (#43138197) Attached to: Ohio Judge Rules Speed Cameras Are a Scam
Yes, I do expect people to notice how long the light has been green. It's called paying attention to your driving. ("Huh. That green has been on for a long time... it should be going yellow soon."). Be aware of where your point of no return is. Once you pass it, then you don't need to change your speed. Same with the other person who talked about the pedestrian walk signs. If they've gone to the blinking hand, you know that the yellow light is coming soon as well. And the part that seems to be confusing to some: you're supposed to stop for the yellow light, not the red. Yellow doesn't mean "If I gun it, I can still make it". Hmm.. checking my driving record. No tickets for running a red, no accidents.

Comment: Re:Linus Torvalds is his own worst enemy (Score 1) 786

by Imagix (#43004955) Attached to: Linus Torvalds Explodes at Red Hat Developer
Even if there is another anti-trust suit... it'll take about 7 years before it finally gets resolved, and in the meantime the lockdown is already in force. And the hardware wasn't designed from the ground-up to only run one OS. It was designed to run a whole bunch of different things, then right at the end they actually add an additional lock to prevent other OSes from running.

"I think it is true for all _n. I was just playing it safe with _n >= 3 because I couldn't remember the proof." -- Baker, Pure Math 351a

Working...