Have you looked at cable lacing? You could skip the trays and just suspend the laced bundle from the celing.
No need to call him Dr., he's been stripped of his medical license. http://healthland.time.com/2012/01/13/great-science-frauds/slide/andrew-wakefield/
You want to control a computer with your heart? Surely you mean an EEG.
Power consumption varies with the square of the voltage (p=v^2/r) while the power consumption varies linearly with the frequency, if it takes signicantly more voltage to over clock then it's no wonder the power usage is so high.
I was in the same boat 4 months ago, a nikon D7000 was the right choice for me.
Lets generously assume that 1/10 flights has PED's on and that FTA there are 32000 flights per day and 75 actual PED incidents on 1/4 of the flights between 2003 and 2009. The probability that given an electronic device is on there will be an incident P(PED incident | PED on), is the probability that an incident happened and a PED was on divided by the probability a PED was on P(PED on ^ PED incident)/P(PED on)
(75 incidents/(32000flights*365days*7years*.25 of airlines surveyed))/(1/10 flights with PED on) = 0.003669% chance there will be an incident given that a PED is on
This is a gross understatement of the number of flights with PED's on my experience, in my opinion the claim that PED's will cause in interference is not borne out by the evidence presented.
We spend hundreds of millions to keep me from bringing a bottle of water on a plane, but we can't manage to get protection from terrorist magic rays that will take down a plane just like in the movies? I thought all of these guys went to the Jack Bauer school of counter terrorism.
I think you are misinterpreting the meaning, look at http://artifex.org/~hblanks/talks/2011/pep20_by_example.html for concrete examples for each item
The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters
Beautiful is better than ugly.
Explicit is better than implicit.
Simple is better than complex.
Complex is better than complicated.
Flat is better than nested.
Sparse is better than dense.
Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules.
Although practicality beats purity.
Errors should never pass silently.
Unless explicitly silenced.
In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess.
There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.
Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch.
Now is better than never.
Although never is often better than *right* now.
If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea.
If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea.
Link to Original Source
Forget the getting out of the contract, sue in small claims for deceptive marketing tactics, ask for an injunction baring them from changing their TOS, and have the summons delivered to the local company store that way you will probably win a default judgment.
RIAA Says "Don't Expect DRMed Music To Work Forever" but not the way they meant. It all depends on your point of view, do you want to be able to play music or do you want to prevent it being played. Moores law and enough time ensures that I can decrypt or even recover the encryption key used for a large number of tracks. In the long run DRM is just an annoyance and I will be able do as I see fit with my files.