Spinal nerves are a completely different beast than peripheral nerves. The latter do regrow on their own, slowly. The former don't.
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
Mine's right below the tumor that caused it. Neurological crap is some of the worst crap.
These guys aren't planning to repair a surgical cut, they're planning to graft the spinal cords of two different bodies together.
Maybe they should try to fix a regular decapitation first. Put the head back on the same body and prove that most of the nervous connections still work.. Even that would be worthy of a Nobel prize in medicine.
The same is true for curing cancer, every genetic disorder, and every viral disease.
Also, we don't even know if a solution exists.
This isn't like pursuing heart transplants before being able to fix each and every heart defect. It's like pursuing heart transplants before being able to do surgical sutures.
Seriously, are the people who cleam this serious? I don't think so.
The best entries, however, didn't rely on AI, but on the fact that the RNG of the arcade game isn't random. Once the Asteroids-bot figured out the internal state of the RNG, it could basically use hyperspace to make targetted jumps (and never one that lead to the destruction of the ship), shoot at asteroids that haven't appeared yet and various other tricks. It was very impressive to watch one of these bots in action.
Delivered by spring-loaded injector disguised as an umbrella.
Unfortunately, our current capability is probably closer to 0.000008 ly than to 0.8 ly.
Producing more offspring that manages to procreate.
'Most fit' must can only be meaured as the ones 'that survive'.
No, survival is a necessary, but not a sufficient criterion. Reproduction rate is what actually counts. If there are two groups with different reproduction rates, the larger one will eventually become completely dominant, especially when the two groups start getting into conflicts about resources.
Maybe they like this particular game? I'd love the chance to play City of Heroes or Earth&Beyond again. I wouldn't mind paying for that opportunity, either.
Few users means this game is not that much fun anymore.
Dictating what other people have to consider "fun" is ridiculous. This is just a super lame excuse to trick/force companies to share their code for nothing/free.
They could keep a server running. Or charge for the server module. Their choice.
That's bullshit. The code belongs to the copyright holder to do as he/she sees fit during the copyrighted phase, they should not lose it.
Sorry, copyright law was supposed to beneficial for both the public (which profits through the promotion of, er, the sciences and useful arts) and the creator of the work (who has an easier time monetizing it). Using copyright to force the public to stop using the old stuff and spend money on the new stuff is flat-out abuse of copyright law and should not fall under its protections.
The 1700's are about a few thousand years after authors started producing works in writing, and about a really, really long time after the first cave paintings (which, under todays copyright laws, would absolutely qualify as protected works). So, copyright laws are a recent phenomenon compared to the type of activity they apply to.
Printing privileges were more about using a certain technology and less about the intellectual property of the produced works. Copying a work by hand wasn't covered by printing privileges.
That's roughly 500 years of precedent.
Really short when compared to more mature laws, e.g. laws against theft and murder. Those have been around for thousands of years. Or are you somehow saying that laws more recent than that lack validity?
They lack maturity. And, had such laws been in place during the time of the Roman Empire, we'd still be stuck in the Dark Ages. That's obviously not the case for laws against theft and murder.
This must be from an American perspective. The history of copyright law is, compared to other types of law, so short that it really doesn't have much history.
If copyright laws had history, we would have lost a lot more works of authors from antiquitity to, say, Mozart, than we actually did. Had the concept of copyright existed 2000 years ago, building up culture (for lack of a better word) would have been impossible.
Also, copyright laws should promote the sciences and useful arts, at least that's how it's worded in the US. Using them to deprive the public of (commercial or noncommercial) access to the work is against the spirit of copyright law.
Photon. Time is nonexistent.
Or $TIMELESS_DEITY. Time exists, but has about as much meaning as the time index of a video. It makes more sense to watch everything in proper order, but you're free to watch the thing in reverse if you like.
But time-ordered sequences of events are only possible after t=0.
Imagine you're a CPU and your perception of time is in clock cycles. Would you be able to give an ordered sequence of events of all the things that happen before your clock generator starts, e.g. voltage ramp-ups, etc?