Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Bad IT departments are like the Mafia . . . (Score 1) 330

by Idou (#43960023) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: How Do You Prove an IT Manager Is Incompetent?
You will probably have to use some kind of technicality to get rid of the IT manager. For my company, it was a combination of things, including the HR manager noticing that the IT manager was only coming into work like 4 hours a day on average (which was used with other circumstantial evidence). However, even after we got rid of that manager, we are still in the process of "hitting rock bottom" as we try to fix years of managing the department like a nation of fiefdoms . . . it is amazing how much damage one incompetent high level manager can do . . .

This is really why IT needs to establish some kind of professional certification like doctors, lawyers, and accountants. It is not so much that you will prevent the incompetent from getting certified (though, certainly, hard testing does help prevent that). However, the main thing is that it creates an incentive for any certificate holder to try to keep their certification (our fired IT manager actually brags about how little work he was doing) and provides employers some leverage ("please help us with a smooth transition or we will report you to your professional organization . . ."). Until then, things will continue to be the wild west, so good luck trying to replace the old sheriff in town . . .

Comment: Lemonade from lemons . . . (Score 2) 59

by Idou (#43935815) Attached to: Atomic Bombs Help Solve Brain Mystery
But I really think we could have done this more cheaply, more ethically, and more humanely through a controlled experiment. Call me jaded, but I have absolutely no romantic feelings of nostalgia towards the cold war. It was a time when the timeless "mine is bigger than yours" human defect almost destroyed human civilization.

Comment: Re:The same reason there no more anti-war protests (Score 2) 227

by Idou (#43382103) Attached to: Why Do Pathogen Researchers Face Less Scrutiny Than Nuclear Scientists?
>For partisan political advantage. Really? Had nothing to do with a very possible nuclear war apocalypse (which almost happened, from my knowledge, at least once . . .).

>Pathogen research offered no such advantage. Maybe if a version of the Nagasaki or Hiroshima bombings were to occur with pathogen research, you would start to see some more protests. Humans are not very good at understanding risks, such that it can take seeing cities of people perish in unimaginable hell before they actually care enough to get involved.

The rest of your post gives examples that basically do not even come close to a "global apocalypse." In fact, your post seems more politically motivated than the protests against nuclear war. If nuclear science was also a target, I would consider it as just a casualty of being too closely associated with the very real threat of nuclear war apocalypse at the time. Seems some of the blame for nuclear science getting a bad wrap should go to weaponization and use against large numbers of civilians.

+ - Zidisha ("Kickstarter" of the developing world) almost reaches $600K. ->

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "Per their website, "Zidisha is the first peer-to-peer micro-lending service to offer direct interaction between lenders and borrowers across the international wealth divide. We eliminate the middleman, ensuring that entrepreneurs' profits stay right where they belong – in their communities." Per their statistic page, they claim a 97.71% return rate, their average interest rate is multiples below the global average for micro-financed loans (even after adding their 5% finance fee), and they are just about to surpass $600K loans raised. Apparently they have so many stories to share that the director published a book. For those skeptical about capitalism, perhaps this is an example of how we can hack it into something better."
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:Maybe.. not yet (Score 1) 104

by Idou (#41421393) Attached to: Walmart Abandons Amazon's Kindle Lineup
  • Perhaps Amazon is not so profitable because it is a technology firm and is expected to invest in future innovations rather than save profits for large dividends to investors (compare dividend yields).
  • Perhaps investors understand that Amazon is in the process of taking over the industry and are willing to weather lower profits now to see significant gains in value later (compare P/E ratios).
  • Perhaps brick-and-mortar stores have higher barriers to market so they can charge more monopoly rents than online retailers.

There are many reasons some companies are currently profitable, none of those reasons necessarily mean the company will be profitable in the future, especially when face with disruptive technological trends.

Heisenberg may have slept here...

Working...