When I need to dust the house, I just wash the cat.
_Every_ office has management snitches. Some are open, their job is, in part, keeping management informed. Some are less openly snitches. Usually they are trying to advance their own position.
The trick is to identify all the snitches early, then feed them disinformation at just the right time. Usually that means you had to feed them a little good information first, just to identify the data paths and get them to have confidence in you as a source. This means others could see you in their snitch identification tests. Be careful what information you use in your tests. Don't throw anybody under a bus.
Hence you are fucked.
Pretty safe assumption. 10% absolutely crooked, 10% absolutely honest, 80% wish they were honest.
Working memory is the space that you actively think on. It's not clear how it's stored, but it's clear that most memory is not just words. An AI will start with an in memory way of storing connected concepts; actors, linguistic, mathematical, logical, not understood but remembered cause/effect, image. Parsing the information into working memory involves putting it into a form that the intelligence can use.
This is a pretty well understood concept. The details are the tricky part.
Wait just a god damn second. Are you claiming you understand a woman?
Much less bold then claiming to understand women, but I'm still calling BS on you.
Most people go their whole lives and don't even begin to understand themselves, much less another adult.
You don't know what 'working memory' means in the computer or neurological sense? Hint: how is it stored?
You should just shut-up. You're embarrassing yourself.
How much is this dude making take home?
Including graft, protection and money stolen from citizens or what he tells the IRS?
A human mind can manipulate a concept, apply it to new situations and concepts.
A concept written down is just static information, waiting for an intelligence to load it into working memory and do something with it.
Of course, if their hypothesis is correct all the statistical data will have to be re-calibrated to account for the occasional rain of meteors.
Also note: Age estimates for larger impacts will have smaller error bars.
IIRC you can estimate crater age by counting the # of smaller craters/area and using statistics.
Does a book or a web page really know the information it contains?
Is a concept held in human working memory equivalent to the same concept written down?
By the same argument you could say that any good library from 1950 was also smarter then a human. You'd be just as wrong.
I have no future as an English teacher or reporter. Though I see lots of illiterate reporting.