Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:What? (Score 1) 256

by Hognoxious (#43776077) Attached to: IBM Takes System/z To the Cloud With COBOL Update

Even if I'd known about those features, I would have been taken out and shot for using them. As I said, bizarre coding standards, rigidly enforced.

There was something terribly clunky about arrays. I remember writing an EDI converter. Because the order of the incoming records doesn't correspond to that of the outgoing ones, and they don't correspond 1:1, you need a lot of arrays to park stuff until you have a whole transaction to cut, shut & put. Except either it didn't have arrays, or we weren't allowed to use them. Nightmare.

This is 20 odd years ago, so time plus the natural tendency of the mind to protect itself might have obscured some details.

Comment: Re:What? (Score 1) 256

by Hognoxious (#43773343) Attached to: IBM Takes System/z To the Cloud With COBOL Update

In the mid 90's, when I had to use the darn thing, it was primitive control structures, no variable scope (OK, one) and general verbosity.

Though in fairness it was an old implementation, plus the coding standards there were peculiar and zealously enforced, so it's possible that they didn't even teach us the alternatives.

Comment: Re:Anyone? (Score 1) 256

by Hognoxious (#43773049) Attached to: IBM Takes System/z To the Cloud With COBOL Update

Fresh out of college my first job was as a C0807[1] programmer. About the only thing I remember (apart from what an utterly horrid language it was) was that, according to the (c) message the compiler printed before the inevitable ten dozen syntax errors, it was older than me.

Some of the micro guys used these Fisher-Price variants you speak of. Still, unless they're so different as to be effectively something else, I can't think of anything less suitable for graphics.

[1] I will not utter it here.

Comment: Re:You might think your plumber makes big bucks (Score 1) 367

by Hognoxious (#43771437) Attached to: Bloomberg To HS Grads: Be a Plumber

Then a socket set with a straight socket. Another common tool mostly useless for plumbing.

Do you mean something like the thing for replacing spark plugs? It would be fine for attaching a faucet - if there was no pipe attached.

Are you honestly saying that tools a regular person bought to, say, work on a car, would work for replacing a toilet or faucet?

Did I write anything remotely like that?

http://www.homedepot.com/p/BrassCraft-12-in-Steel-Basin-Wrench-T151/100006605#.UZmqOSJ9sYV

Eleven bucks. A plumber's going to charge four times that for turning up.

I am the mother of all things, and all things should wear a sweater.

Working...