at least they wait till a judge tells them to.Too many companies/websites are handing over information if they are asked.

why do chinese political aktivists use gmail there are far more secure email systems they can use and why would miltiary and political officials use it when they have acces to government email systems except when they dont want their emails to be read and archived for the public intrest. Also why is it only Gmail that keeps on getting attacked by the chinese are they the only ones who mention it?

Will all these books be ones that are too old to be copyrighted.

and is called Ghostery. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ghostery/

Now I guess that the police can anonymously post comments to a site then go in and seize their servers because of comments posted to that site and get information on all the commentators.

article about how the comments were detected http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2011/01/472622.html full list of comments http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2011/01/472619.html

The police also have been shown to hide the evidence collected by the undercover agents if it does not help them lead to convictions or even shows that they are lying to the prosecution. http://policestate.co.uk/articles/109 As well as the undercover police inciting violence the normal police often do it as well at protests. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXNJ3MZ-AUo&feature=related As well as intimidating protestors with FIT teams and questionable tactics including ketteling.

There is no positive proof that it is the police were posting all the comments. All the comments are coming from the governments internet gateway that the police have access to but you cant actually prove it was them.

Mission abandons you. Then you end up locked in a small confined space.

"A professional would have written any acquired data to a public-key-encrypted disk that would only have been accessible to one who possessed the private key - like with Wikileaks 'insurance' file" This is basically saying that the best way the commentator says of doing it is how wikileaks has encrypted their file. There is not even how the harddrive was encrypted