Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:tau is wrong (Score 1) 241

by HarvardAce (#39331913) Attached to: Pi Day Is Coming — But Tau Day Is Better

Division is harder than multiplication. Given the choice between sometimes multiplying by 2, and sometimes dividing by two, we should pick the constant that forces the multiplication. Also, e^(pi * i) is nicer than e^((tau / 2) * i).

Hogwash! Multiply by 1/2 or divide by 1/2, and now the problem is reversed!

Comment: Re:22 light years (Score 1) 288

by HarvardAce (#38917349) Attached to: New Exoplanet Is Best Yet Candidate For Supporting Life

Since there is little friction in space what is there from stopping us from reaching an appreciable fraction of the speed of light? I was reading that we might attain lightspeed in about 1 year at 1G acceleration rate which only adds a couple of years to the trip..

Using force = mass * acceleration, energy = force * distance, distance = 1/2 * acceleration * time^2, and e=mc^2:
to accelerate a 1000kg payload at 1g (9.8m/s^2) for 1 year:
Energy to do so: 4.8 x 10^19 J
Equivalent mass of that energy: 532kg. That's also assuming Newtonian physics (no relativity), and not counting the fact that you have to account for the mass of the fuel. Let me know when we can produce 216kg of antimatter and then "burn" it in a controlled manner that directly corresponds to thrust.

If you use an energy density of 50,000 Wh/kg (very aggressive estimate of high-end energy density in current/near-future rocket tech), you're talking about needing over 2 billion metric tons of fuel (and don't forget you have to accelerate all that fuel too which now means you're no longer talking about a 1000kg payload.

Comment: Re:Raw- or OOP-base Lua? (Score 1) 145

by HarvardAce (#38893593) Attached to: Wikipedia Chooses Lua As Its New Template Language

True enough for people who run a website that mainly revolves around their wiki.

However, lots of people just throw a mediawiki install to supplement the rest of their site, usually precisely because it's dead simple to get running and works on just about any host. Moving to another host just to preserve their little 10 page wiki is probably not sensible, and the content is probably in-appropriate for external wiki hosts (or isn't desirable for other reasons).

Obviously for people with their own server (or in my case, a VPS) this is a non-issue .. but I figure there are probably enough people for which this would be an issue that I can't see them not at least providing a PHP only implementation as an option.

In your simple case, is there any reason to upgrade to a version of MW that implements LUA for templates, especially if it means an incompatibility with your current provider?

Comment: Re:Thats given me an idea... (Score 5, Informative) 416

by HarvardAce (#38763714) Attached to: What To Do With a 1,000 Foot Wrecked Cruise Ship?
$25M for a cruise ship? It cost 372 million pounds (or approximately $570M) to build in 2006. Aside from your order of magnitude, however, you have the right idea. It is quite probable that repairing the ship would be the most cost effective solution for the cruise line and its insurers.

Carnival's estimated financial impact factors in recovery and repairing of the ship rather than scrapping it, currently.

Comment: Re:The ratings agencies are worthless (Score 4, Informative) 1040

by HarvardAce (#37024294) Attached to: S&P's $2 Trillion Math Mistake

"All you need to know about rating agencies is that in May 2010 Moody’s still rated Greece triple-A." - Mark Steyn

I don't doubt that Mark Steyn said that, but what he said is false. In April 2010, Moody's lowered Greece's rating from A2 to A3, which is definitely not the same as Aaa. It is closer to "junk" rating than a triple-A rating. It is also worth noting that less than two months later, in June, Moody's cut the rating all the way to junk status, Ba1.

Comment: Re:Escape Velocity (Score 1) 208

by HarvardAce (#36828364) Attached to: NASA's Hubble Discovers Another Moon Around Pluto

Using Pluto's density of 2.03 g/cm^3, I compute (at 21 mile diameter) the moon is 4.2e16 kg.

With a 4.2e16 kg mass and 1.7e4 m radius, I compute an escape velocity of 18 m/s, or 40 miles per hour.

So I suspect you could jump really hard and not come back down, assuming I didn't misplace a decimal point.

I didn't double check your math, and you're obviously intentionally exaggerating the speed of a jump, but someone who could jump at 18m/s would have a vertical leap of about 16m or 50 feet on Earth.

Comment: Re:Let's lobby for a new standard (Score 1) 208

by HarvardAce (#36828022) Attached to: NASA's Hubble Discovers Another Moon Around Pluto

I thought there were still some stupid states that hadn't done that, or are you saying the last holdouts (I'm thinking PA was one) finally changing their exit numbering?

They haven't changed them here in CT or in nearby NY yet. There are, however gaps in the numbers sometimes...not sure if it's because the exits were removed, planned but never made, or someone didn't know how to count. For example, the first exit on I-95 in CT is exit 2.

To understand a program you must become both the machine and the program.

Working...