Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Snapchats Don't Disappear - deleted photos foun (Score 0) 103

by HJED (#43801595) Attached to: Why We Should Celebrate Snapchat and Encourage Ephemeral Communication
No, but most developers just assume that the OS's delete function works, and both accessing the deleted files and deleting them properly requires root access.
Until people started publishing step by step guides for the purpose of retriveing these files, the tools available where quite difficult to use and required a reasonably high level of technical knowledge.

Comment: Re:Snapchats Don't Disappear - deleted photos foun (Score 1, Funny) 103

by HJED (#43801317) Attached to: Why We Should Celebrate Snapchat and Encourage Ephemeral Communication
Nope, they used data forensics to recovery files, the same techniques used to recover deleted files from desktop computers by criminal investigators, it is not something most developers would consider likely and (until very recently thanks to snapchat and the media attention) something that most users would not have the technical ability to do, especially on a phone.
That being said snapchat developers probably should have fixed it by now (by overriding it before deletion like secure deletion tools do)

Comment: Re: What and what? (Score 2) 103

by HJED (#43801297) Attached to: Why We Should Celebrate Snapchat and Encourage Ephemeral Communication
Actually it does in the same way that pressing delete in a file browser does, (the article doesn't explain it very well) the problem is that that can be recovered using data forensic tools as it is not overridden merely unmapped. I would argue that is a flaw (or an efficiency decision) in the OS. If you want to securely delete something on a computer you need to use a tool that overrides it a few times first.

Comment: Re:HTTPS means something specific (Score 1) 251

by HJED (#43766619) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Why Do Firms Leak Personal Details In Plain Text?
Um, SMPT dose not use encryption between mail servers, it is older then TLS and whilst there are secure extensions to the protocol for client/server interactions there is no TLS protocol for server to server interactions.
It is possible to encrypt emails with private/public key combinations, but I have never seen an ecomerce site do this.

Comment: Re:Electricity costs money. (Score 1) 232

by HJED (#43614901) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Would You Accept 'Bitcoin-Ware' Apps?
I think the idea here was instead of an add funded app to have an app that funds itself by mining bitcoins on clients computers (or phones?) Personally if the process didn't slow down my computer significantly I think I would use it. The question is would the app actually be running enough to return a profit.

Comment: Re:Hehe, happened to me years ago (Score 1) 95

by HJED (#43565213) Attached to: Suspect Arrested In Spamhaus DDoS Attack
That's actually incorrect if you are using shared hosting you tend to get hurt every now and then by spamhaus and other such lists as they block IP address not domain names. It is very easy for one user (who is then usually removed by the hosting company) to get a large number of domains blocked.
I have domains hosted with Jumba an Australian hosting provider and whilst they seem to be constantly improving there security to stop this (to the point where it is extremely annoying) it still keeps happening and means that I am unable to send emails from my domain to people using services such as hotmail.

If you have nothing to do, don't do it here.

Working...