Why? Because for biologists, there is no relevant difference between microevolution and macroevolution. Both happen in the same way and for the same reasons, so there is no real reason to differentiate them. When biologists do use different terms, it is simply for descriptive reasons. When creationists use the terms, however, it is for ontological reasons — this means that they are trying to describe two fundamentally different processes. The essence of what constitutes microevolution is, for creationists, different from the essence of what constitutes macroevolution. Creationists act as if there is some magic line between microevolution and macroevolution, but no such line exists as far as science is concerned. Macroevolution is merely the result of a lot of microevolution over a long period of time.
Evolution Explained - Micro vs Macro
It does, and I quote "
WoWGlider lost a case where Blizzard claimed that them copying the game into memory violated their copyright. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glider_(bot)
Merriam Webster http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardless
Merriam webster: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardless
It is still a word.
2) Have shell company send take down notices about my competitors website
3) Watch them vanish from the search results