Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:But how long before this is actually usable? (Score 4, Informative) 114

Depends on what you mean by usable. It immediately prompts a study of human populations to identify how certain defects can impair it's function which will likely lead to the development of gene therapies to correct those defects, and if beneficial variants can be identified, could later lead to general purpose gene therapies to slow the rate of aging. It may also lead to studies for the development of drugs to modify it's action, but thats probably farther out than basic gene therapies for those with defective instances of these genes.

Comment: Re:"Clean Room" implementation (Score 3, Interesting) 239

by GryMor (#39792115) Attached to: Schmidt Testifies Android Did Not Use Sun's IP

Equitable and promissory estoppel: Sun helped project Harmony and was deeply involved in it's creation, to the extent that it infringed, it had permission to do so. Sun definitely received benefit from this arrangement as parts of Sun's own implementation were contributed, as a result of Harmony, by Google.

Comment: Really old idea (Score 5, Informative) 77

by GryMor (#39542471) Attached to: Using Pulsars For Spacecraft Navigation

This has been in use in sci-fi since the dawn of space opera. It gained sufficient use that it was internalized to the point that it's rarely mentioned anymore, you could even say it's why most sci-fi expects a reliable knowledge of location and date even in the face of miss-folds and unplanned time travel.

Comment: Re:Coming to an anti-capitalist country near you (Score 1) 157

by GryMor (#39398601) Attached to: Indian Government To Tax Angel Funding

Stock Split: No capital gains, you didn't sell/buy anything (value of a share was halved, quantity was doubled)

Credit card: No VAT, the VAT is on what you used the credit card to pay for (at least, in every country I've been in that had VAT).

Sold Home: No capital gains (capital loss, in fact) for the given example.

Comment: Re:Earth's rotation (Score 1) 226

by GryMor (#37728596) Attached to: FTL Neutrinos Explained... Maybe

Only relative motion matters, aka, in the inertial frame of the source when the leading edge of the beam was emitted, how much has the target moved by the time the leading edge of the beam reaches the detector.

At two points opposite each other on the equator, that distance would be less than 2.3 meters, with only 730km separating the source and target, that distance is only a few centimeters (the source and target have nearly the same velocity)

Comment: Re:Having Read Both Papers (Score 2) 226

by GryMor (#37728546) Attached to: FTL Neutrinos Explained... Maybe

Physics (and velocities) don't work like that, you can't simply sum them.

If, in a third reference frame, 2 objects are observed to be approaching each other at .75 c, co moving observers in the frame of either object would calculate their respective closing velocity as .96 c

The velocity addition formula is:

s = (v + u)/(1+(v*u/c^2))

A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works.

Working...