Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
News

Fisher Capital Strategies:London Anti-doping Chief->

Submitted by
strategiesfcm
strategiesfcm writes "http://www.sacbee.com/2011/06/16/3706395/london-anti-doping-chief-issues.html
The Associated Press
Published: Thursday, Jun. 16, 2011 – 12:44 pm
ROME – The director of the anti-doping lab for the 2012 London Olympics has a warning for any athletes considering using banned substances.
“If you want to take drugs don’t come to London – because we’ll catch you if you take drugs,” professor David Cowan said at the end of a World Anti-Doping Association symposium on Thursday.

Cowan heads King’s College London’s Drug Control Center, the only WADA-accredited lab in Britain.
“The IOC is aiming to test more and more athletes,” Cowan said. “All I can tell you is that in Beijing there were 5,000 samples taken, so obviously that will increase, but even I do not know the exact number.”

About 10,000 athletes are expected at the London Games, and Cowan will be aided by nine other WADA lab directors from around the globe during the competition.
“The biggest challenge with the Olympics is dealing with the (limited time frame),” said Cowan, who also was the head of the forensic science department at King’s College.

“Give me two weeks and it makes things relatively easy, but you hit me with a lot of samples at the same time that’s where you need help from your colleagues, to make sure you make the right decision at the right time.”"

Link to Original Source

Perform Starts for South Sudan->

Submitted by fredcooke819
fredcooke819 writes "Work Starts for South SudanOfficials of the Republic of South Sudan basked Sunday in the glow of a a single-day previous nation. By Monday, they will start off perform on building an overall economy that now is dependent on oil for 98% of its profits.

South Sudan officials say they will target on weaning the financial system away from oil by investing in the country's agricultural sector, which is amid the most fertile in the area. But the world's newest region, hived off Saturday from Sudan, Africa's greatest nation, nevertheless lacks basic wellbeing, education and roads, not to mention motels, a decent airstrip and other essentials to accommodate traders.

Offered individuals conflicts, celebrations aren't anticipated to previous very long. South Sudan is presently a main recipient of assist as it seeks to create the circumstances for domestic and foreign industry to flourish. The U.S., for instance, has invested $300 million on growth assistance to South Sudan as it has sought to produce a new federal government. The European Union not too long ago authorized a similar quantity of assist to the country.

"There actually isn't a private sector that is sufficiently broad" to take in the unemployed, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice claimed on Sunday. "There is a terrific deal to be accomplished," she additional.

Even now, South Sudan has plenty of oil. Practically all of the 500,000 barrels of oil made a day involving north and south arrives from the south. But the south splits the oil sales revenue with the Khartoum-centered northern federal government, which owns the pipelines, refineries and ports from which the oil is exported. Given that a 2005 peace accord with the north, the south has depended on oil profits to pay salaries and retain its interim govt operating.

That is why the govt is conversing about a path that seeks investors over and above the electricity discipline.

"The sources with which nature has endowed our land are abundant adequate to entice the curiosity of advancement partners both equally from the public and personal sectors from a lot of countries across the entire world," South Sudan President Salva Kiir claimed through independence ceremonies Saturday. "So we should exploit these possibilities to far better the lives of our people today."

From 2007 to 2010, personal investors acquired roughly 6.five million acres of land in South Sudan, an area about the dimension of Massachusetts, according to the charity Norwegian People's Help. Expense has gone into timber, mining as effectively as oil.

"The south has a lot of h2o and rainfall and is very fertile, so if they can set up excellent governance and use their oil income to build the economy, there's a great opportunity for them to be successful," explained Hassan Satti, an economist centered in Khartoum. "But if they start badly, they will be in problems."

Massive-scale farming is essentially nonexistent in South Sudan, and there are just 30 miles of paved road in the entire country. Its funds, Juba, is not related by road to the south's largest towns. Some authorities ministries operate out of trailers. Foreigners from neighboring African countries dominate neighborhood markets and have set up hotels and restaurants to cater to the influx of help personnel.

"South Sudan is incredibly open for company," mentioned Doug Bushman, member of the Southern Sudan-American Trade Association. "They genuinely require almost everything."

Energy cuts are frequent, and the electric grid is dependent on an oversized diesel generator, as do most of the hotels and help-group offices. A blockade to the north imposed by the Khartoum government practically brought Juba to a standstill last month when fuel stocks ran out ahead of fuel could be trucked from neighboring Kenya.

Meanwhile, talks with the north more than shared oil profits have stalled. Neither aspect can concur on how prolonged the two sides should carry on a fifty-fifty split of revenues, or if or how considerably the south ought to pay in transit costs to ship the oil north by way of Khartoum-owned pipelines.

Some U.S. officials warn South Sudan in opposition to making use of its oil prosperity as a crutch, and urge it as a substitute to produce option industries as soon as feasible. "It is so easy to be corrupt in the oil business," U.S. Special Envoy to Sudan Princeton Lyman stated. "It will harm the picture of the new government quickly" if oil revenues are mismanaged."

Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:Groups (Score 1) 183

by GreekLawyer (#36640646) Attached to: Copyright Common Sense From Telecom Ericsson

People must eventually see the obvious paradigm shift;

In the analog era, the economic agents (movie studios, gaming studios, etc) had to GUESS demand, invest THEIR OWN money, a priori, and thereafter hope for people will like their offering.

Ergo, they had to protect their investment because they did not amortise it.

This is an entirely limited-due-to-technology model and places the "chariot, before the horses".

In the digital era however, the horses (demand) are placed in front of the chariot (supply).

See initiatives like kickstarter.com, flattr.com - the movie/gaming studios can propose their offering, collect the funds and thereafter produce.

Moreover, the producers can make money, on the side, by offering scarce goods (memorabilia, signed items, paid dinners with actors, producers, scriptwriters etc).

disclaimer: this does not mean in any way that the new system is perfect - it is just a better than the old one and also inevitable because the digitisation of information renders the old one obsolete

Comment: Re:Not too surprising (Score 1) 177

by GreekLawyer (#32865306) Attached to: The Hobby of Energy Secretary Steven Chu

Well the whole article and point is actually BS as a quick search in wikipedia reveals;

Quote

Beside his scientific career, Chu has also developed interest in various sports, including baseball, swimming and cycling. He taught himself tennis by reading a book in the eighth grade, and was a second-string substitute for the school team for three years. He also taught himself how to pole vaultusing bamboo poles obtained from the local carpet store.

Unquote

Comment: Re:His Master's Voice (Score 1) 1015

by GreekLawyer (#31976744) Attached to: Don't Talk To Aliens, Warns Stephen Hawking

The aliens are already in front of us and they are the black holes!

Seriously now, humanity and any other advanced civilisation are simply entropy maximising objects in the Universe.

Humans have moved over the course of the years from using slaves (our own bodily energy resources) to splitting the atom in a clear direction of entropy maximisation.

The natural progression would be the creation of a black hole which is the maximum entropy object in the Universe.

In view of the above, there would be no point for an advanced civilisation to go to the far-end of the universe in order to conquer earth or our galaxy - they would first gradually harvest all the adjacent energy and matter and would not go out of their way to Earth as the cost benefit analysis would come back as negative.

For these reasons I would not worry - that is exactly what is happening with the black holes that we have already detected - the aliens are gradually consuming the adjacent energy and will not bother with us until we become neighbours.

Even then, we should not worry too much as this is the fate of all the universe - if you worry too much perhaps you should consider becoming Christian or alternatively believing in any other deus ex machina dogma

Comment: Re:They can be art (Score 1) 733

by GreekLawyer (#31907190) Attached to: Roger Ebert On Why Video Games Can Never Be Art

Art has never been defined properly and such discussions have taken place for ages - even a toilet seat has been submitted by marcel duschamp as art -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fountain_(Duchamp)and artists that the time were discussing whether it is art or not.

The thing is, one distinctive characteristic of the cloudy concept of art is that, as Oscar Wilde said, all art is useless.

Human's act 99% of the time in order to survive - they sleep, eat and work.

If they waste their time in order to create something which is pleasuring or even hurting the senses, this has a sense of purposelessness, in the sense that it does not assist survivability per se - therefore it is art.

Art=the item that is being created and has no use other than to provoke the senses

Videogames are a creation and do not increase survivability in any direct manner - therefore they are "useless" and therefore art

Comment: Re:When they're right, they're right (Score 1) 386

by GreekLawyer (#31809622) Attached to: The Economist Weighs In For Shorter Copyright Terms

You may not believe in those guys but fact is human' life expectancy is growing;

Source, Wikipedia:

QUOTE

The number of centenarians is increasing at 7% per year, which means doubling the centanarian population every decade, pushing it into the millions in the next few years.

Japan has the highest ratio of centenarians. In Okinawa, there are 34.7 centenarians for every 100,000 inhabitants [6].
In the United States, the number of centenarians grew from 15,000 in 1980 to 77,000 in 2000

UNQUOTE

Tying copyright span to human life is entirely antithetical to any form of human progression - very few things will ever come into the public domain which is not very conducive to evolution - you would have to practically shoot Bono in order to be able to listen to his music after 100 years!!

Having said that, if you do not believe in Kurzweil you must be very short sighted - things are pointing towards a technological singularity, a fact predicted not by my snake oil merchants but by John von Neumann in 1958;

Source Wikipedia:

QUOTE

In 1958, Stanisaw Ulam wrote in reference to a conversation with John von Neumann:
"(...) One conversation centered on the ever accelerating progress of technology and changes in the mode of human life, which gives the appearance of approaching some essential singularity in the history of the race beyond which human affairs, as we know them, could not continue. (...)"

UNQUOTE

Stem cells, nanotechnology, protein and genomics medicine, transhumanism which is already taking place (I am communicating this message wearing a pacemaker, contact lenses and by mobile keyboard) will make us almost immortal.

I understand that this runs contrary to commonly accepted notions but the whole trend points to that direction and no other, therefore it is irrefutable-

Comment: Re:When they're right, they're right (Score 1) 386

by GreekLawyer (#31789880) Attached to: The Economist Weighs In For Shorter Copyright Terms

IMO there should be a fixed copyright term from the time of first publication. Death, no death, whatever. Nothing else matters.

Totally agree with parent - has anybody seriously considered the fact that with medical and technological advances average life expectancy will grow immensely, even possibly rendering a transhuman entity immortal (Kurzweil, Grossman et al) and therefore also copyright protection infinite? Humanity has better things to worry about such as quickening the time in which we will become a type II and III Kardashev civilization (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale) and longer copyright protection surely is not assisting in that direction at all!!

Never raise your hand to your children -- it leaves your midsection unprotected. -- Robert Orben

Working...