Comment: shocker. (Score 1) 1
so you are saying that using an open standard is better? *gasp*
|
|
so you are saying that using an open standard is better? *gasp*
the classic excuses come to mind:
* we would have to re-train people to use it aka Linux is scary (as if they dont already train people to use MS products)
* vendor lock-in (but not a direct addmission)
* open source is insecure (o rly?)
* microsoft provides supports and linux doesn't (*cough* red hat?)
so basically, no legitimate reason.
Developers don't choose when to release software, it's management. Think you need to do more testing but management thinks it looks ready? It's out the door and you cant do anything to stop them. Testing is just as important as coding and the developers dont do all the testing, it's usually outsourced.
Bottom line: if a company doesn't do it's due diligence then yes, they should be responsible for putting out bad software.
now that they have decent hands, we will have robots stealing our cereal. they're always after me lucky charms.
So "click harder" will be a valid solution, now, so that the computer can finally understand urgency.
How long until someone makes a window manager that allows pressure to control the priority of a window's process?
That sounds terrible. Call the GNOME developers!
But I get to be the second horseman, you insensitive clod!
anyone who plays games that use EA's "always connected" DRM are going to be screwed shortly.
Google's filing (PDF) affirmed that they have not paid media for articles or done any quid pro quo in exchange for coverage. However, they acknowledged that many people receive money from Google through other means (the company's philanthropy, ad business, etc.), and asked the judge if he wanted further details about those instances.
stupid Google, dont you know that as a corporation you are supposed to deny and impede any attempt to get information about what you've done and tie it up in court for years? just look at Oracle, they deny everything until the bitter end and fight tooth and nail to budge an inch on any information at all. i mean, volunteering information? for shame!
this "don't be evil" stuff is really getting in the way of becoming a well adjusted sociopathic corporation.
I wanted to send a note that by the end of the day today, OnLive as an entity will no longer exist.
but corporations are people too! if you cause them to stop existing then that is MURDER!
just add that anyone that tries to enforce their patent automatically invalidates said patent.
problem solved!
Cumulonimbus or GTFO.
YOW!! The land of the rising SONY!!