Reserachers from MathLogic deparement of Land of ZoggyPoos discover that
a COULD CAUSE b
does not mean the same thing as
a DOES CAUSE b
despite much confusingness.
Basically says it all. One could dress it up as a serious research paper, but what's the point, it would only be a waste of a precious scarce and becoming scarcer resource (trees).
Things were good in the old days. Then there were the brief happy days of the eight-bitters. The Amstrad 6128 was my idol then. It booted in just under two seconds, you could program just by typing a number followed by a space and then your code; you could run by typing run, without... get this... without even compiling, and things just worked... or else just crashed the computer, but there was always ctrl shift escape and, if that didn't work you could flick the off switch without corrupting your data, and did I mention it booted in under two seconds! Oh how far we have fallen in our search for crystal castles with see-through walls and shiny fruit so beautiful you can't even eat it without poisoning yourself (if, that is, you can even get something 27" across down your throat).
<translat source="english" target="legalese">
Are you drunk? No, seriously... are you drinking scotch and whiskey with a side of crack cocaine while you "examine" patent applications? (Heavy emphasis on the quotes.) Do you just mail merge rejection letters from your home? Is that what taxpayers are getting in exchange for your services? Have you even read the patent application? I'm curious. Because you either haven't read the patent application or are... (I don't want to say the "R" word) "Special."
Numerous examples abound in terms of this particular Examiner not following the law. Clearly, the combination of references would render the final product to be inoperable for its intended use. However, for this Special Needs Examiner, logic just doesn't cut it. It is manifestly clear that this Examiner has a huge financial incentive to reject patent applications so he gets a nice Christmas bonus at the end of the year. When in doubt, reject right?
Since when did the USPTO become a post World War II jobs program? What's the point of hiring 2,000 additional examiners when 2,000 rubber stamps would suffice just fine? So, tell me something Corky...what would it take for a patent application to be approved? Do we have to write patent applications in crayon? Does a patent application have to come with some sort of pop-up book? Do you have to be a family member or some big law firm who incentivizes you with some other special deal? What does it take Corky?
Perhaps you might want to take your job seriously and actually give a sh.t! What's the point in having to deal with you Special Olympics rejects when we should just go straight to Appeals? While you idiots sit around in bathtubs farting and picking your noses, you should know that there are people out here who actually give a sh.t about their careers, their work, and their dreams.
Your job is not a joke, but you are turning it into a regular three ring circus. If you can't motivate yourself to take your job seriously, then you need to quit and let someone else take over what that actually wants to do the job right.
And if he'd only used a standard Open Source XML Validator to check his source before compiling his letter.
- 1. It gives a real world counterexample to the idea that DRM is Good;
- 2. It gives a real world counterexample to the idea that information is better hoarded and used to make money;
- 3. Exercise for the reader;
- 4. Exercise for the reader;
- 5. It creates jobs for clever programmers to show how they can defeat the crackers;
- 6. It creates opportunities for clever hackers and crackers to show how the clever programmers can be defeated;
- 7. It gives lesser crackers an opportunity to show of their computer skills.
- 8. Exercise for the reader;
- (8.1 Come up with a better exercise for the next reader;)
- 9. You can insert U to get DRUM (I like DRUMs);
- 10. (out of 10.) It shows you who not to waste your money on if you have the option.
Who needs Kdevelop when you can use vi?