The Free Speech provision of the constitution covers government, not private, censorship. Further, you've never been guaranteed freedom from the consequences of said speech, like having it removed because it's unpopular.
They already do: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02...
Hmmm replies to a post about how the grandparent doesn't have DB experience with a DB joke. Sure you're not a recruiter?
Budweiser. Not strictly a "rice" beer, but it's definitely one of the adjuncts.
When it's left the cute and precious stage?
Yet is the operative term here. Sooner or later you dance with the reaper.
Wouldn't this apply to all Tesla owners?
Without the usual diet of bad stuff happening what will they use to feed their various fears and neuroses?
This sort of thing has been going on for years, probably as long as there have been companies and products. Can't get X to work, maybe your neighbor can, why not ask? In the case of software and other technical products, it really costs the company little to setup a forum, so why not? Also the people doing the supporting are completely volunteer, and are compensated in a feeling of helping others. If they don't want to participate, then they can stop at any time.
Sadly they're supposedly not saving much money doing this either.
What part of the current system do you think is fair, and gets resources to the most in need? It does a great job of moving resources around, and storing value, but nothing about it is fair, balanced, or guarantees distribution to the places best or helpful for society.
Clear out bad moderation on my part, please ignore.
At 2 billion a year, I doubt it's easier to pay them.
SGI IS the dinosaur.
Yes, because both sides are always equal in culability. Just some random examples off the top of my head: Mugger/Muggee, Murder/Murdered, Rapist, Rape Victim. Yulp, definitely a LOT of blame to go around....