Wow. +1 "Enlightening".
Wow. +1 "Enlightening".
What do the WHO's peer reviewers say? There has to be a WHO paper on this surely.
And it's a play on words. The French can't get their head round "Robin Hood" and therefore call him "Robin des Bois" (Robin of the Woods), which I guess makes sense.
Sort of a prototype for "Dark Vader" (the notoriously excellent French subtitlers originally thought the name was "Dark Invader" but soon saw the error of their ways -- the problem being they only saw half of them).
"Units first" is the way of the future: ‘increasing speed to warp 8, sir!’.
Obviously based on countries that always put the currency sign last, even for amounts like 100£ or 100$.
Or possiblly on those that use the currency sign as the decimal point (when the decimal fraction is omitted).
In the anglosphere, the custom is currency first unless you write it out in full (10 euros/dollars/rand/shekels/pounds).
Spontaneous: "Performed or occurring as a result of a sudden impulse or inclination and without premeditation or external stimulus".
So all these theories suggest that non-life->life happens without any external stimulus? They are indeed crap.
I don't think there's a direct Einsteinian route from energy to body mass. But there is a direct route from food mass to body mass. Ask any body builder.
If you burn more calories than you eat you must have them stored in your body somewhere, fatso.
Architectural works are already copyright restricted in many countries. (I use the word restricted rather than protected consciously as the latter is a lie.)
Even the lighting of them can be photorestricted. Snap the Eiffel tower in the daytime, no problem: Gustav has been dead much longer than Walt. Snap it at night and that's a different matter.
I have 6GB which serves me fine so when I read the article I was going YAY!
Then you bastards just had to spoil it for me didn't you.
if it was in no way publicly taboo, then where's the UK porno-lovers group standing up for porno rights?
Porn lovers have never had it so good. If they didn't stand up before they aren't going to now.
And not using one's physical advantages to push annoying shortarse whiners out of their way, is that socialist?
In their international operation, Carphone Warehouse becomes just "The Phone House". And it has been so for over 15 years.
So I guess if the UK operation is still called Carphone Warehouse, they must still be in love with it.
I don't personally see the advantage in passing through a middleman. Same phones, same operators, same contract.
Because we all know open source is the antithesis of sanitation. Still, I find you're being a bit harsh on Stallman there.
And why is this a problem? BBC programmes are made for a British audience; that's why Brits pay for them. They have British news, British weather, British humour, and take place in dismal British towns. Will your licence fees go up if other people watch too? Will it lower your quality of life? Will this make a shit of difference to the BBC?
Does it bother you or did you even know that in Belgium, to name but one country, they have been watching the Beeb for free for decades? Does it bother you that Spanish, French, and talian drivers don't have to pay on British motorways? Would you like to see toll booths installed to catch them?
Do you really believe that when you watch ITV you don't also pay? Someone must or it woudn't exist. And if you watch French TV, who pays? Does your watching advertisements for Carrefour and Auchan and BNP and Justin Bridou saucisson fund the French stations? Or are you getting them for free while everybody in France shops at exorbitant prices?
Any way I look at it this objection, is a non-sequitur.
"Given the choice between accomplishing something and just lying around, I'd rather lie around. No contest." -- Eric Clapton