Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Bout time (Score 1) 83

by Gloizen (#36674768) Attached to: Defendant Says Righthaven Should Pay Legal Fees
Incorrect.

What if you, and dozens of people like you, were ripped off for $1k - $2k by a small fraudulent corporation, and you have solid evidence to prove it? Lawyers typically charge at least $3k to go to trial, so they'll tell you that you have a good case, but that it doesn't make financial sense for them to represent you. Most lawyers (understandably) won't consider a class action lawsuit unless there are $ hundreds of thousands at stake and a high chance of winning.

But if you try to bring your good case to court without a lawyer against a company that has a lawyer, you have very low odds of winning, even if you are legally savvy. If you were going to be required to pay the other side's legal fees if you lose, you'd be crazy to even try. With a "loser pays winner's costs" system, the fraudulent corporation would have even less incentive to stop defrauding people.

Comment: begs question: what is practice of law? (Score 1) 246

by Gloizen (#36624748) Attached to: Lawsuit Claims <em>LegalZoom</em> Is Practicing Law Without a License
Unauthorized practice of law is prohibited. OK, fine. But what is "practice of law"?

Merely telling someone what the law says is *not* practicing law.
Representing someone in court is *certainly* practicing law.
There's a lot of grey area in between.

How about analyzing a client's situation, reviewing applicable law, advising the client of their legal options, and recommending a course of action? That's what most lawyers do. That sounds like "practice of law" to me.

But if *that's* illegal (for a non-lawyer), then wouldn't it be illegal for me to tell my driving student, when he is approaching a red light, that red means stop, and that he should stop?

Books

Bible.com Investor Sues Company For Lack Of Profit 181

Posted by samzenpus
from the isn't-it-ironic dept.
The board of Bible.com claims that it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle, than to make money on the domain name, but an angry shareholder disagrees. From the article: "James Solakian filed the lawsuit in Delaware's Chancery Court against the board of Bible.com for breaching their duty by refusing to sell the site or run the company in a profitable way. The lawsuit cites a valuation done by a potential purchaser that estimated bible.com could be worth more than dictionary.com, which recently sold for more than $100 million."

Comment: Re:Lousy Article (Score 1) 1086

by Gloizen (#14867426) Attached to: Financial Responsibility == Terrorism?
why didn't you just pay cash for the ring?

I bought it online, so my options were credit card, check, or wire bank transfer. The retailer's policy was to hold checks for 9 days to ensure that they cleared, and I wasn't willing to wait that long. Had I known what a hassle the credit card was going to be, I would have just paid the extra fee and wired the money. (In the end, that's what I did once I got my money back from the credit card company.)

To understand a program you must become both the machine and the program.

Working...