Don't be so sure.

Moore's law was only formulated to last a decade or two. It's gone longer but eventually we will start hitting some plateaus of development in all likelyhood. Though we probably won't notice too soon as once faster equipment becomes too expensive to develop we'll still have a lot of room to work on faster more efficient code.

You'll know Moore's is starting to fail when companies start advertising faster code for their products.

The server itself is still public and it isn't your code to commit. You are being paid, generally, to create code for someone else; thus it is their code. This means that you are putting the code on an outside host of unknown security, and is still wrong.

Didn't Moore's Law include a ten year limit anyway?

At least until Moore's Law ends. Dunno when it will happen but assuming the continued survival of the human race there will come a time when our computers are not becoming more powerful with each generation.

For the short and moderate term you can risk relying on Moore's but in the long run all good things come to an end.

Yeah the VPN would be re-provisioning and the streaming service would defiantly count as high-volume

I'd bet the ToS violations had nothing to do with his data usage and everything to do with the server racks. A lot of ToS's specifically ban servers.

So you're in favor of having your firearms inspected and having to report to regular training and drills by the Federal Government for owning a firearm?

Nor was it created to be the land of the free. At least for a large minority of its population. Remember the second amendment includes the words "well regulated" even our founding fathers thought there should be regulation. Individual rights must be balanced against the rights of others, and that is no easy task.

Though yes. The product shouldn't be banned just because it has the potential to be used to make a gun. The second part of your argument is valid, but please cut the "Criminals won't do it" argument. It is just a tired poorly rendered talking point.

That's right. Murder and theft laws too have never worked and WILL never work because criminals don't obey the law! In fact all laws are pointless because criminals will just ignore them and they only restrict those who are law abiding.

See any flaws in this logic?

Don't forget to read history and learn how worse it was when a single gas company supplied the whole nation.

I read cyberpunk novels. Things are pretty much on course.

The key as always is what you are using the hardware for determines what type of hardware is best for you.

One thing is also G Glass is only the first and not much of a first. It is just a slight step in convenience for having the camera at the ready and on. Nearly everyone has a cellphone now.

The thing a surveillance state requires two things. Mass surveillance apparatus and a single large entity behind it. What will end up with more likely is a surveillance or sousveillance society. Where cameras and recording devices are ubiquitous but control over them is not held in any single set of hands.

Yeah. They talked about this in Newton's day, Aristotle's too.