Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:Better Link (Score 5, Insightful) 188

by Gaygirlie (#48893589) Attached to: WhatsApp vs. WhatsApp Plus Fight Gets Ugly For Users

I'm not sure that WhatsApp has a leg to stand on as reverse engineering is allowed, and could be opening themselves up to legal action.

Companies providing an online service are perfectly within their legal rights to deny users of 3rd-party applications, it has nothing to do with reverse-engineering. They can't deny you from reverse-engineering stuff and using that stuff on your own, but they can deny you access to their services, then.

Comment: Re:Benchmarks for that AMD chip look bad... (Score 1) 180

by Gaygirlie (#48815029) Attached to: Tiny Fanless Mini-PC Runs Linux Or Windows On Quad-core AMD SoC

Personally, I think it's actually pretty swell. I have a Core 2 Duo T7500 - laptop serving as a small-time server at home and compared to that this AMD E1 Micro-6200T provides 75% of the performance at ~11% power-consumption! Of course, compared to desktop CPUs it's going to suck ass, but hell, would it be fair to compare a Pinto to a Ferrari and complain about the performance?

Comment: What if I have no likes? (Score 2) 80

I have a Facebook-account due to family, but I make maybe one post a year there and I never like anything whatsoever. What does such an algorithm tell about me? I mean, it sounds to me like the algorithm is already biased towards certain kind of people from the get-go if it only applies to socially-outwards people who enjoy "liking" stuff on Facebook.

Comment: Re:It's a con... (Score 3, Interesting) 109

by Gaygirlie (#48781523) Attached to: Cryptocurrency Based Basic Income Program Started In Finland

It sure looks like scam, and even if it wasn't it at least doesn't look like trustworthy or that the people behind it are too skilled. Even their website is like it was made by a 12-year old, including faulty UTF-8 and all. It certainly doesn't instill any sort of confidence in these folks!

Comment: Re:HTTP isn't why the web is slow (Score 1) 161

by Gaygirlie (#48774413) Attached to: HTTP/2 - the IETF Is Phoning It In

A lot of the various Internet-engineers disagree with you. Have you looked at how much traffic is spent on nothing more than headers? There's a lot of stuff spent on those. Now, multiply that with the said scripts and other files you mentioned, with every single file or request generating all those headers. Then, multiply all that with the number of users accessing the servers, and you have shitloads of traffic eating away at your bandwidth all needlessly. There have been a lot of attempts all around that try to reduce this clutter, like e.g. Comet, WebSockets and so on.

You're only seeing things from the perspective of the end-users, but for those running servers or those providing the bandwidth it does really matter.

Comment: Re:So get protection (Score 3, Informative) 92

by Gaygirlie (#48735397) Attached to: Finnish Bank OP Under Persistent DDoS Attack

Actually, it seems the attackers are mostly just a loose bunch of youngsters trying to emulate the big groups, ie. Lizard Squard and Anon I certainly have not heard anything hinting towards any ransom. F-Secure already has identified and knows from before of several of the attackers, so we can expect arrests soonish.

Comment: Re:'make -j64 bzImage' (Score 1) 449

by Gaygirlie (#48715709) Attached to: How We'll Program 1000 Cores - and Get Linus Ranting, Again

The compiler doesn't actually do parallel processing when you're compiling the kernel, it does multi-processing and that's the crux here; when you're compiling the kernel each process that spawns works on its own set of files -- multi-processing, that is -- whereas if it was doing parallel-processing they'd be working on the same files simultaneously. They are two very different concepts and you're confusing them.

Comment: Re:HDD Advantage (Score 1) 190

Is SSD reliability/longevity still lower than the HDD's, or is that no longer true (or is the opposite true nowadays)? -- Two petabytes of data written on a cheap, consumer-grade drive and it's still going strong. Not all drives last that much, but basically you can use the drive for two decades without much worry. Of course you're still better off using a non-SSD for something that keeps on chugging data to the drive 24/7, but for pretty much any other use-case they're perfectly fine these days.

Comment: Re:Why Steam? Why? (Score 4, Insightful) 160

by Gaygirlie (#48625437) Attached to: To Fight Currency Mismatches, Steam Adding Region Locking to PC Games

"Because people will move or travel, and all there games will stop working" -- This has nothing to do with the games not working, it's only about being able to buy games or gift games in those cheap areas. If you have bought the game it'll still continue to work, regardless of where you bought it or where you're playing it in.

Comment: Re:Sounds like my Sony Blu-Ray player (Score 3, Insightful) 82

by Gaygirlie (#48623735) Attached to: Manufacturer's Backdoor Found On Popular Chinese Android Smartphone

Have you checked if it uses HTTP or HTTPS for its traffic? If it's just plain-old HTTP you could redirect the traffic to Sony's servers to a server of your own instead and always just reply with "everything is ok, no updates available, please continue." That's what I've done to several apps and appliances, thereby removing myself from their prying eyes and granting me access to things even when manufacturer's servers are unavailable.

Comment: Re:This game has issues with both nVidia and Win 8 (Score 1) 91

by Gaygirlie (#48519493) Attached to: <em>Dragon Age: Inquisition</em> Reviewed and Benchmarked

What is a disaster is the PC controls.

Ugh. Why do so many AAA-games ship with broken controls on PCs? That really pisses me off. I was planning to buy the game, but now.. well, I've been burned by horrible controls so many times in the past that I'm just not so keen on repeating that anymore :S

Mathemeticians stand on each other's shoulders while computer scientists stand on each other's toes. -- Richard Hamming