Its about FUD. From the Rockefeller foundation, the UN, the governments of the west, who all want in on this new bandwagon.
Which bit exactly is the FUD? That Exxon scientists went from publicly backing the rest of the scientific world's ideas of climate change to silence (and even championing the denier's cause) on the matter at the direction of their company masters? Which is more likely; that the entire scientific community, the UN, the governments of the world have all worked together to produce an enormous set of fake theories and data without a single whistle-blower or leak coming out to provide evidence of this monumentally huge conspiracy, or that the corporate interests have turned to the same right wing think thanks who attempted to debunk the link between smoking and cancer to spout exactly the same anti-science claims about global warming?
Where is your evidence then? Remember, without evidence your claims are just FUD. With all the leaked emails from the Climatic Research Unit the best "evidence" came down the some terminology (eg. the word "trick") and some out of context statements that the scientists didn't have all the answers yet. With the ability to accept such vague non-evidence as proof of nefarious activities, it is amazing how demanding the deniers are of the need for perfection and not a single amount of uncertainty from the scientific community.
Your appeal to authority only impresses those that have already bought into your ideology.
Incorrect. It only doesn't impress the people who are so anti-science that they have their head in the sand on this matter. Frankly, nothing is going to get through to people like you.
The sky is blue. The brown you are talking about is invisible and has no demonstrated any harm so far. But you and your "specialists" assure us we are doomed.
I know another body of people who assure us we are doomed, and they have a big report out called The Bible, its true, because all the Bible experts say its true.
Seriously? This is supposed to be your evidence that it all a lie? The entire scientific world has it wrong because the Bible got it wrong too? Is that supposed to be a better appeal to authority?
The UN and associated governments have been outspending 10 to 1 any moneys put forth by those "big oil" companies, in propaganda in the last few decades.
Do you any even a shred of proof of this statement? You assume that what the scientific world is saying is propaganda because you have presupposed that greenhouse gases do not linger in the atmosphere and that they don't result in a warming effect on the planet. Without that presupposition, all the scientific community is doing is their job. Coming up with theories and looking at the data to see if it is true - just like any other group of scientists do. Or do you think cosmologists, physicists, biologist, botanists all have their own agendas that they are each attempting to foist on the world. Hmm, maybe that explains quantum physics.