And then he's going to do the jump bare-chested. Riding a bear.
So we're now using 'The Secret' as our engineering method? Cool, we're using it for everything else in Govt. anyways...
...except in Germany, where it's known as the "French Cockroach".
Or, to quote the great Jack Donaghy, "We are an immigrant nation! The first generation works their fingers to the bone making things, the next generation goes to college and innovates new ideas, the third generation...snowboards and takes improv classes."
That's because they're giving it 110%.
Since they also make pottery, I thought maybe they were bringing back old-school Fiesta Ware: http://www.orau.org/ptp/collection/consumer%20products/fiesta.htm
Sounds like something that idiot Michael Moore would say. I propose we call it Moore's Law. Oh wait...
Yeah, a closer description would be the 'Nomenklatura': http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nomenklatura
Ah yes, the engine that fell into some farmer's field. A classic.
Though not at Dover, don't forget the Operation Babylift crash: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Tan_Son_Nhut_C-5_accident
Runners who use minimalist/no shoes generally use a forefoot/midfoot strike (the ball of the foot hits the ground first), while those with thickly padded shoes are usually heel-strikers.
Heel strikers tend to run more upright, with the heel landing well forward of the runner's center of gravity, while fore/midfoot strikers lean more foreward, with the foot landing almost under the CG. It's like you are always just 'falling forward', with your feet catching you from falling on your face. It takes some getting used to, but the effect is much lower impact than heel striking.
The reasoning is twofold: 1) If your foot lands well forward of your CG, you are effectively retarding your forward progress and increasing the force traveling up your legs, and 2) By striking with the heel, you remove the flexing of the foot and calf muscles as a shock absorber, and the force travels directly up the leg - right up into your knee. The padding in the heel of the shoe (and it's always the heels that are heavily padded) don't make up for the loss of the foot/calf system as a shock absorber.
You can run using a fore/midfoot strike with a thickly padded shoe, but the thick heel just seems to get in the way.
Yep, the Fulton Recovery System - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulton_surface-to-air_recovery_system
I get the impression it was similar to ejecting from an aircraft: Yes it worked, yes it was fairly safe, but you only did it if you really had to.
Having lived in both the Boston area (Cambridge/Somerville) and Albuquerque (considered more of a 'sprawl' city), I can say that Boston was better if you are a *consumer* of culture. Obviously, ABQ cannot hold a candle to Boston for museums, symphony, cuisine, etc.
However, I noticed when I moved to ABQ that a much greater percentage of people I met were *producers* of culture - people in dance/theater troupes, people in bands, folks who restored cars, someone who played amateur football - and this was working at a similar DoD-oriented facility to the one I had worked at in Boston. The folks in ABQ actually had a little time/money left over at the end of the day to pursue hobbies.
Was it high art? No, but what is more 'enriching', someone listening to a symphony or someone who composes a song themselves? I ended up getting a Masters in Architecture, which would have been utterly impossible in the Boston area - I was so maxed out paying the mortgage and other expenses I could never have afforded to take the time off.
Well, there is that adage about the person who gets rich in a gold rush is the one who sells picks and shovels...
...what with history being over, he needed something else to do.
A big government program without Pork? Good luck with that...