Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Comment Re:Just doin' business (Score 3, Insightful) 251

Yes, but the description above indicates that they are trained not to take "no" for an answer.

It's not good business to irritate your customers, unless it doesn't matter because you have them locked into your service due to a virtual monopoly.

Looking to find and fill a genuine need for your customer = good.

Trying to sell them something they obviously aren't there for (such as additional services when they are looking for tech support) = bad.

Continuing to bother a customer when they tell you that they're not interested = terrible.

Comment Re:Why can't it be both? (Score 4, Insightful) 362

I actually understand his point. If Tesla just makes batteries for other companies, then they don't see Tesla as competition. If Tesla's also producing cars, then they are far less likely to do business with them regardless of how good their batteries are.

It's still a terrible idea. For the most part, the other car companies won't innovate unless they have competition. Tesla is far more likely to create real change by existing as a car company than they are by existing as a parts company.

"Free markets select for winning solutions." -- Eric S. Raymond