Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Cyber Monday Sale Extended! Courses ranging from coding to project management - all eLearning deals 20% off with coupon code "CYBERMONDAY20". ×

Comment Re:really?? (Score 2) 1134

False. If it's supported by CLI, any user can script it and build a GUI easy, suddenly you don't need to type any commands on the CLI.

Conversely, if it's only supported by a GUI, we're in a really shitty state. If that feature is a complete waste of time and should be automated, we have to spend hours looking for ways to hack the internals rather than just use the great and oldest API.

Comment Re:Asimov naive? I don't think so. (Score 1) 146

I don't really think that is really an accurate description either. Rather, in Asimov's view autonomous robots would be completely uncontrollable without something like the three laws, and that even with the three laws there was still considerable danger to the operators.

Asimov's view was that if you tell a robot it can kill people, it's going to figure out a way to twist that into an order to kill you. You don't fuck around with telling robots to hurt people, it's just too dangerous due to the unintended consequences. You need to make sure that the robot is starting from purely altruistic intentions. I don't think it was a simple plot device, but a very considered belief.

Comment Re:Dear Steve Ballmer (Score 1) 337

The funny thing is, Apple's products that compete with Microsoft's core products are shit. Have you ever tried to use OS X Server? It's impossible to administer well. Windows Server 2008 R2 is a fine system by comparison.

Apple flat out gave up on XServe, and what's more they've basically done the same with Office. Microsoft, in contrast, is still very much in the game when it comes to everything Apple and Google are doing.


Microsoft Counts Down To XP Death 766

mikejuk writes "Microsoft have just released an end-of-support countdown gadget that ticks off the days until XP is no longer supported — but it only runs under Vista or Windows 7! It focuses the mind on the fact that XP is being forcibly retired. It is a wake-up call to think hard about the unpleasant situation and consider the alternatives.So as you watch the count down to XP's death tick by think about the problems created by using software that actually belongs to someone else..."

Comment Re:In my corporate environment.... (Score 1) 1307

Exactly backwards. IT already has access to all patient info since, I hope, it's being backed up.

Not at all. I haven't personally worked with such systems, but my understanding is that in modern heathcare systems, everything is encrypted with multi-factor authentication, and all IT has access to is encrypted snapshots. If the professor was working on some sort of research that was ongoing and needed a system, I could see making the decision that it was just a prototype, and the best way to keep it relatively secure for a few months of the project was just not to give anyone but a few tech-savvy medical people the keys (and not back it up.)

This obviously isn't such a case, but the fact remains that if IT has access to all patient info, you're not HIPPA compliant.

Comment Re:In my corporate environment.... (Score 1) 1307

Sounds like poster is a professor. Probably with tenure. In any case, professors in technical fields need wide latitude in setting up computers to do their jobs.

That said, this doesn't sound like research, this sounds like something simple that IT should be taking care of. (Of course, that's not to say IT should be forced to implement it, they have their own priorities, etc.)

Only way poster has a leg to stand on is if this thing somehow touches patient info. Then I can see an argument for keeping IT out.

Comment Re:Stupid (Score 1) 178

The point though was that the specific ordering of the laws was the most stable form. The one presented by Motorola here is supposed to be flawed because when the android is allowed to place its own safety above obeying the human, it is easier for it to do things that have unintended consequences. It's also suggested that the robots can subconsciously disobey the three laws, especially by pretending not to see unintended consequences.

1000 pains = 1 Megahertz