Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Nasa should reclaim this (Score 1) 234

by Firas Zirie (#32090272) Attached to: US Air Force Launches Secret Flying Twinkie

Ok, so what? The shuttle goes fast and far, doesn't mean there cannot be a reusable orbital craft. Not to mention that 99.99999% of the 'far' is spent in almost no stress drifting around. It's nearly meaningless, even though it sounds impressive to the uneducated.

It's not exactly no stress. The shuttle's interior is pressurized while it's in a vacuum. Pressure = stress. It's tremendously critical that everything is absolutely airtight. While I agree that liftoff/re-entry are probably the most stressful parts of the mission, I think you are taking credit away from the amazing engineering that goes into the shuttle. Even if it is just "drifting around".

Comment: Re:Utter stupidity. (Score 1) 449

by Firas Zirie (#31832514) Attached to: In EU, Google Accused of YouTube "Free Ride"

Your analogy doesn't apply here. ISPs do in fact charge you more when you want to use more bandwidth (analogous to your bigger car).

In this case what's happening is (in a car analogy no less) that some new theme park opens which is very popular (YouTube), so more people start driving their cars on government owned roads to visit it (ISP pipes). The government is making the visitors (ISP clients) pay tolls to use the road (bandwidth), but now also wants to make the theme park owner (Google) pay for being so popular that many people want to visit them! Which is a bullshit argument since if the theme park wasn't there, no one would use the road to get to it which would mean no revenue for the government.

These greedy ISPs just want to profit off of Google's success.

Comment: Re:Not human-sustaining (Score 1) 123

by Firas Zirie (#29690645) Attached to: More Water Out There — Ice Found On an Asteroid

Although it's an important discovery, the real importance lies on finding water on objects that we may one day need to live on. We're never going to set up facilities on an asteroid. But on a moon we certainly could, and finding water ice there would be significantly more revelatory.

By that logic, Galileo and other early astronomers who sought to explore space and discover distant planets were wasting their time. Since at that point in history getting into space was barely conceivable.

Exploration for the sake of exploration may seem pointless to you now, but knowledge about our universe is beneficial to the human race.

Comment: Re:NOT author & publisher's choice (Score 1) 370

by Firas Zirie (#27025167) Attached to: Amazon Caves On Kindle 2 Text-To-Speech

Amazon should not have caved to this ridiculous request. The final choice is with consumers, who should refuse to buy any book that they can't run through text-to-speech or any other device that enables them to use their purchase.

While I agree that Amazon should have told these guys to go fuck themselves, what they have actually done is a brilliant "carrot and stick" maneuver that will ultimately get them what they want:

1. Amazon gives in to the Guild's demand (the carrot), and will conveniently label those books on their site which prohibit TTS.

2. People who think the Authors Guild is a bunch of dicks can boycott the clearly-marked titles and purchase others.

3. Sales of TTS-prohibited books plummet (the stick).

4. Authors Guild realizes that their greed has actually cost them money, and reverses their decision.

.

.

.

5. Profit!

~Philly

There I corrected that for you.

Comment: This is a new level of low (Score 1) 426

by Firas Zirie (#26871813) Attached to: Facebook's New Terms of Service
Ok now this is seriously annoying. If they claim they can use my content while I am a member then that's probably acceptable since you can choose to deactivate your account at any time. But forever? I mean this probably won't affect most users but how about people who'd like to showcase their artwork/photography or something to their friends and family? They can just take it and use it for commercial purposes without consent and if you currently have them on their servers you have no chance of opting out? I'm wondering if they gave any warning about this change, but since I'm a relatively active Facebook user and haven't noticed anything I doubt it. The shame is that most people won't even have a clue about this.

Comment: Re:This is going to work... (Score 1) 561

by Firas Zirie (#23649123) Attached to: The One-Use, Self-Destructing DVD Returns

So you're saying that having a less-than-brilliant business model should be illegal? As in, Congress or state legislature should pass a law banning bad business ideas? If so you're just as screwed up as this FlexPlay crap.
Ummm no that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that selling a product that renders itself useless after a set period of time for no apparent reason should be illegal. If I buy it, I own it, and if they want to govern how long I can use the product... well that's what rentals are for!
Businesses

Blizzard and Activision Announce $18.8bn Merger 298

Posted by Zonk
from the jigaa-whaaaaa dept.
Ebon Praetor writes "The BBC reports that Blizzard and Activision have announced an $18.8bn merger. Activision's CEO, Bobby Kotick, will become the head of the joint company, while Vivendi, Blizzard's current parent company, will become the largest single investor in the new group. Even with the size of the merger, the combined company will still be smaller than the industry giant EA. 'As part of the merger plan, Blizzard will invest $2bn in the new company, while Activision is putting up $1bn. The merged business will be called Activision Blizzard ... Vivendi will be the biggest shareholder in the group.'"

From Sharp minds come... pointed heads. -- Bryan Sparrowhawk

Working...