gpl first freedom (0):
"the freedom to use the software for any purpose"

"we encourage people who redistribute free software to charge as much as they wish or can."
from http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html

The cost of distributing someone else's gpl work is licensing your derivative work under the same license. The face up fairness of this deal is what appeals to so many developers. Every license has rules.

Nobody calls him SJ.

Seems like a sexist prick thing to say.

Just sayin,

Where are Attila Dimedici's comments where he can justify such an outrageous summary? I think if I submitted a story, I would at least follow the discussion. The impression he is leaving about Tesla closing it's doors is irresponsible at best.

Maybe when you get older you will understand, and situations like this will not seem so weird.

you mean this quote from the article you linked to

"Mr. Hotz expressly tells people on his website not to give him donations for his efforts," Kellar explained. "Even more harmful to Sony's personal jurisdiction argument, the only evidence put forward of Mr. Hotz' PayPal account appears to be a transaction initiated by the plaintiff."

Why would you say what you said when the link you posted as evidence says the opposite?

I don't think you don't lose energy speeding up and slowing down pistons, they are on a rotating assembly and their momentum caries them around.

Incredible!

Also, all the people I have helped by installing and defaulting to Firefox, are now wondering why they have 15 search bars and half an inch of actual browser window. These are the users microsoft wanted back.