|
|
First of all, the Linux userbase is really small to begin with. Within that small userbase, you have two relatively large groups:
1. The ideologues, who really believe in RMS's idea that proprietary software is unethical. 2. The cheapskates, who aren't going to pay for software.
Who's left to sell to?
Well. Apparently I don't exist! Good to know.
What tata means, then?
PO-TA-TO
Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a stew.
Well, obviously (?) I was kidding, but if you REALLY want to know, I love Fringe.
With the mood in the posts above you, it's really not obvious. But I'm glad you like it.
If I were the Iranians, I would want nuclear weapons, too.
If you want to be sanctioned back to the bronze age for the rest of history.
Better than bombed there.
Now we need a chip that can take any given problem and divide it into one thousand parts so we can feed it into these processors. -Gives me a headache!
It's called a "programmer".
Now, look at the release dates for most of those games. It's great that you're getting yesterday's games today, but some of us want to play today's games today.
A year ago? (AC2, CoP, SC2) You know, I'm fine with that.
Moore's law is ok. I prefer that law, forget the name right now, that says that as computational power increases, windows will require ALL of it to run, greatly increasing demand for CPU and RAM, and lowering the cost of hardware just behind the curve for the rest of us.
As Intel giveth, Microsoft taketh away.
Thirteen at a table is unlucky only when the hostess has only twelve chops. -- Groucho Marx