Comment: Re:Hard evidence (Score 1) 271
Go ahead and mod me flamebait or troll. It appears that is the necessary reaction to calling hyperbole what it is.
Comment: Re:Hard evidence (Score 1) 271
Two points. First, he isn't making a new allegation. Second, does the friggin' Telecom Immunity Bill ring a bell? Hellooooooo, McFly. They didn't decide to protect these people on a hypothetical.
Perhaps you're right and most likely there is something there. But you do realise that you can substitute almost any government bill in there and any industry and have a scary conspiracy theory.
Myself, I would prefer to have a bit more evidence before I break my pitchfork out.
Comment: Re:Are we all criminals? (Score 1) 217
I thought fingerprinting was reserved for people in jail?
In the UK not only are fingerprints taken, but DNA samples as well. It's all kept on one ginormous database.
Mind you, this isn't just for people in jail. It's for people that have been suspected of a crime or investigated whether they have been convicted, charged or even arrested for the crime. It isn't just serious crimes either; While I don't think they'll get your DNA for jaywalking, I read about a 10-year-old boy caught throwing eggs who is now in that database.
All I'm saying is having this info on your passport is pretty far down the list of what people, in the UK at least, should be up in arms about.
Comment: Re:Ouch (Score 5, Insightful) 849
all you folks need to remeber that profanity is NOT covered in the first amendment, it protects political free speech, not calling each other names or the like.
It's scary how misguided you are. Here's the First Amendment.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Kindly point out where it states that only political speech is covered. Profanity is most definitely covered by the First Amendment. You are thinking of obscenity which is a different animal and one that has had a shifting definition. Saying you're a fucking nitwit is entirely within my rights.
Comment: Re:80 hours (Score 1) 1055
I decided it wasn't worth it and I wanted a bit more out of life so I got out.
Comment: Re:America, for one, welcomes... (Score 1) 734
Yeah
:-) it's 3 hours away from my home, Brussels (thanks to the Eurostar) and London is one of my favorite cities :-). I have already visited twice this winter :-)
Sure, if you value your freedom and liberties, come to London! Only CCTV cameras everywhere (currently estimated to be 14 per person in the UK), police with stop and search powers, metal detectors at tube stations if you fit the 'profile' and freedom of expression if you don't actually offend anyone (http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/may/20/1). But no fingerprinting at the border!
I'm an American and I live in London. I think the States have gone overboard but there is a funny European tendency to somehow not see what is going on in their own living room.
Oh well. I'm just waiting till Jacqui Smith requires me to have my national ID card.
Comment: Re:Easily abused as a biological weapon. (Score 1) 193
Of course given your proclivity to create a conspiracy theory based on anything whether it exists or not makes me doubt anything would change your mind.
Comment: Re:ah, what about immunocomplex? (Score 1) 193
Comment: Re:ah, what about immunocomplex? (Score 1) 193
It works by stimulating the immune system to fight the invader and it works quite well in killing off the cancerous tumours.