Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Costs of education? (Score 1) 551

by El Kevbo (#37494188) Attached to: Your State University Doesn't Want You

The cost of education really has sky-rocketed. Perhaps a study or two needs to be done on the real cost of education...

There have been and continue to be many studies examining the costs of higher education. Some posters have already mentioned the shift in education from a "public good" to a "private good" and the consequent reduction in state funding and that certainly plays a large role in rising tuition and fees.

Just as importantly, education is a manpower-intensive process; typically, between 70-80 percent of a college or university budget is personnel costs. That means that some of the other costs that have dramatically risen in the last couple of decades, especially health care, have hit education (and other manpower-intensive fields) particularly hard. Further, many industries have seen huge efficiency gains through the use of technology so their costs have gone down. Education, on the other hand, hasn't experienced similar efficiency gains. Education is as complex as the people who are being educated so there are rarely huge gains in efficiencies such as those gained in most other industries through increases in scale.

Yes, we can do better and technology can play a role in that. But that, too, takes time and money to figure out and implement. It's hard to invent a new swimming stroke when you're fighting just to tread water and that's what it feels like to many of us.

Comment: Normal Science (Score 1) 299

by El Kevbo (#36313340) Attached to: Why We Have So Much "Duh" Science

This is very much in line with "normal science" as described in Kuhn's classic book "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions." Most of science is "filling in the holes" of widely-accepted theories and ideas. Because it's not paradigm-shifting, it seems obvious that much normal science can be interpreted as "duh science." It's inherent in the way that science and discovery work.

When the weight of the paperwork equals the weight of the plane, the plane will fly. -- Donald Douglas