Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Bluntly (Score -1, Troll) 407

by Dragon_Hilord (#37553326) Attached to: 150th Anniversary of Greenhouse Climate Theory
I'm personally not buying the whole "Global Warming" bit, and I felt Al Gore's film was based primarily on FUD and Guilt (there were parts such as the little "story" about his child... irrelevant) and known-massaged numbers. Before somebody jumps up and down and screams "denier" or some other goofy label - let's be clear that I think there is some "Global Climate Change" going on, which we may or may not contributing to. The evidence has been shown both ways, and honestly I'm having a REALLY hard time believing either side considering all the bogus political grandstanding they've both had. It's time to remove the vested interests and get some real science done to figure out if we're gonna cook, cool, or just have to do this thing we've been doing for a few thousand years called Adapt. That's my two hopefully unbiased cents.

Comment: Re:Animal torture (Score 1) 154

by Dragon_Hilord (#36553864) Attached to: Homemade 'Mars In a Bottle' Tortures Bacteria

How about we use the same measures for executing animals for food as we do people for crime? Generally, the consensus is they should die (not here, we use prisons, so lets think to a few countries that support "humane execution"), but it is widely held they should not suffer.

If we use the same techniques on animals...? I'm no vegan or anything, I like my meats and fish, etc. As a grower of chickens, I also don't get that "product of animal" thing either that PETA freaks so much about. I *DO* agree, some eh... slaughter houses out there (literally) are cruel and without a care to how much the animal suffers, which I agree is wrong.

Back to worms though, really I don't see some harm in irradiating a few crawlers now and then for science. We've done some messed up things to chimps and people too (look up space flight and rocket chair respectively). In the end, the general consensus is and shall remain: it's good for science and our understanding of our world/universe.

Comment: Re:duh? (Score 1) 462

by Dragon_Hilord (#36436106) Attached to: Ars Technica Review Slams Duke Nukem Forever

If this is the "original vision", I think it should be clear why it never got completed. Gearbox took a design the CREATORS didn't like and used it.

The funniest part is definitely all of us imaging it could have been anything else. Sorry. The only way to do Duke is to hire REAL comedians at this point, and get Ken Silverman back into the team! (no, I don't give a DAMN if it's a raycaster engine, as long as it's True Duke Style).

The demo made me want to vomit. It literally lagged. This was their "final product"?! Fail. Look in the mirror when you jump, that says it all.

Comment: Re:Comments from a new patent attorney (Score 1) 274

by Dragon_Hilord (#36432210) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Reducing Software Patent Life-Spans?

1 - software is taught AS mathematics. it can also be expressed AS mathematics (see Functional Programming). There is plenty of math that has nothing to do with nature. Do you know a mathematician? One of their favourite pastimes is making stuff up that "is neat". It doesn't have much to do with anything, other than to float the creator's boat. You still can't patent it.

2 - software is an artistic expression.

3 - software isn't a process, it's a series of expressions ACCELERATED by a computer. We just call it software cause it's a specialized case of math. you mistake biochem for quantum mechanics.

4 - physical is gears, ropes or chemicals. Electrons do not qualify as any of these things.

5 - They don't have time to "use its [sic] own judgment". Have you seen the latest report on the backlog?

6 - "they affect things that are part of the lives of the average Joe on the street" - anybody who writes any code. "But those Joes generally have no idea of the true issues at play" - neither do you. "less than ten in the last 20 years to my count" - learn to count. "copyrights & trademarks" - protect your stuff and leave the rest of us alone. we're hobbiests and open-source developers/users.

"FWIW, my 2c." - and that's going to be $20,000? Buy a programming textbook and get a real job in the field your profession loves to oppress in the name of big business.

That's my Toonie, eh?

Comment: Re:The issue isn't... nor your political alignment (Score 1) 274

by Dragon_Hilord (#36432038) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Reducing Software Patent Life-Spans?

Get real. What the hell does Republican/Democrat have to do with this? This isn't "call down your favourite party to hate", it's a discussion on PATENTS. Grow the fuck up.

copponex, grow the hell up. You sound like a gawdamn child.

Theaetetus, you're correct.

I'm not american, so don't even try that bull with me.

Comment: New angles (Score 2) 274

by Dragon_Hilord (#36395174) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Reducing Software Patent Life-Spans?

Instead of looking at this with that same crappy "algorithms and software are math" (apologies, but it hasn't worked before, and it certainly won't now (unless we maaaaybe reduce EVERYTHING to 100% pure mathematics)) view, let's start looking for new ways of explaining it to the masses - they don't get it. The fault is not entirely their own cause of their ignorance, we haven't properly educated them. What do you do when people don't get the idea in political situations?

Protest.
Civil Disobedience.
Lobbying.

I'm pretty sure if 1000+ hackers showed up on the doorstep of the whitehouse equipped with laptops running as much patent-violating software as they could possibly muster - that'd be a pretty good start. The only question is who has the gull to show up? Who has the balls to write that code? So far, the one thing the hacker community (and other code-centred groups yes) seems to lack is some kind of motivating factor. Perhaps, and this is just a thought, the right to code what we please?

I'm almost tempted to organize something of these lines myself, problem is I can already smell the -1 rating this is going to earn for "stating the obvious" or "trolling". Can't say I didn't try.

United Kingdom

Oxford Expands Library With 153 Miles of Shelves 130

Posted by samzenpus
from the card-catalog-of-the-gods dept.
Oxford University's Bodleian Library has purchased a huge £26m warehouse to give a proper home to over 6 million books and 1.2 million maps. The Library has been housing the collection in a salt mine, and plans on transferring the manuscripts over the next year. "The BSF will prove a long-awaited solution to the space problem that has long challenged the Bodleian," said its head librarian Dr Sarah Thomas. "We have been running out of space since the 1970s and the situation has become increasingly desperate in the last few years." The 153 miles of new shelf space will only be enough for the next 20 years however because of the library's historic entitlement to a copy of every volume published in the UK.

+ - Repurposing hardware or Lack of decent information

Submitted by Dragon_Hilord
Dragon_Hilord (941293) writes "Recently I dug out some old FTA hardware that's been floating around the house. Apparently these little pieces of hardware have some decent processing power and features and I decided it would be a shame to just throw them out and as such set myself a goal of programming some simple TV games (such as pong). I've been searching around to see about finding some technical information about the chips, but such information is turning out to be a little elusive for them. So I ask Slashdot: where would you suggest I look / who should I ask about technical information with regards to the Viewsat Ultra or the Ariza 700?"

Line Printer paper is strongest at the perforations.

Working...