Slashdot stories can be listened to in audio form via an RSS feed, as read by our own robotic overlord.

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Sky is falling (Score 1) 410

by Dracos (#49183295) Attached to: Microsoft Convinced That Windows 10 Will Be Its Smartphone Breakthrough

MS has been trying to break into mobile for a decade, all while Apple, Google, and (for a while) BlackBerry did.

The Windows brand is tainted, even without the debacles of Vista and 8. Windows is everywhere else, and people are either tired of it (even subconsciously) or don't consider it a thing... it's dangerously close to becoming a generic trademark like Kleenex or Band-Aid, except that no one refers to their computers by the OS, if anything they refer to them by the OEM.

MS doesn't know how to connect with consumers for anything other than XBox. Consumer purchases are driven by emotion, but MS tries to sell to consumers with the same tactics and strategy that they sell to business: dispassionate and cost-driven. Hipsters and college kids don't care about that shit.

Also, MS still seems to do product feedback only to validate their own agenda.

Comment: Mind the gaps (Score 1) 379

by Dracos (#48981219) Attached to: Confirmed: FCC Will Try To Regulate Internet Under Title II

I've been following this rather passively, but all of this talk seems to only mention specific internet access methods: broadband and/or mobile broadband. However, we know there are a myriad of parallel methods, from satellite to dial-up. Unless all US Internet access is brought under Title II, the market will attempt to shift toward whichever methods are most exploitable for profit.

Comment: Re:You probably have one, though... (Score 1) 307

by Dracos (#48925445) Attached to: The iPad Is 5 Years Old This Week, But You Still Don't Need One

I don't have one, and it's unlikely that I will have any tablet, ever.

Touchscreens are a regression in human interfaces. Yes, it's more intuitive than a mouse, but it lacks any way to even emulate buttons after the first, "cursor" positioning is imprecise at best, and worst of all there's just no substitute for a keyboard.

Now that the market is correcting itself, Oremus can finally reveal the sad truth about tablets that many here knew at first sight of the iPad: tablets are for consumption, not production. Jobs thought his reality distortion field could hide that, but it's been powered off for a while now. Tablet sales are slipping because the hype is over and the masses are realizing that they need to get stuff done, so back to laptops they go.

Comment: Re:Noooooooo! (Score 1) 165

by Dracos (#48865743) Attached to: Time For Microsoft To Open Source Internet Explorer?

It wouldn't even take a new crop of IE exploits in the wild to make MS stock drop in price. The first two weeks would be a constant flood of blog posts detailing how crappy the code is. Trident is 17 years old, and many of us have heard how much of an unmaintainable mess the codebase has become in their attempts to implement web standards. Even then, MS would have to release it under a fully open license otherwise no one will taint themselves.

The "new thing", Spartan, is just a rebrand of IE with a new skin. It'll still be built around Trident and Chakra, so web developers will have no reason to have a different opinion of it from IE.

MS needs a new rendering engine, but they'll never use an open source one. Their only real option is to write one from scratch, which they haven't done since IE1, and that engine was replaced with Trident (which they bought) in IE4. There was IE5 for Mac, but that was pretty much a one man crusade and its rendering engine was nothing like regular IE.

Comment: Re:Obligatory Onion link (Score 1) 314

by Dracos (#48823717) Attached to: Radio Shack Reported To Be Ready for Bankruptcy Filing

I was told that by a former employee in a store a couple months ago. I wouldn't put it past RS execs to be doing creative accounting to justify wasting half the floor space with products that don't belong there. They'll get their golden parachutes before anyone else gets anything from a buyout, we've seen it all before.

Comment: Re:Obligatory Onion link (Score 1) 314

by Dracos (#48821965) Attached to: Radio Shack Reported To Be Ready for Bankruptcy Filing

Why is it only now, three decades later, that they are finally going under?

The answer: Cell phones.

Upper management lost its vision long ago, but the coup de grace was when they started selling cell phones to cash in on an exploding market. Trouble is, RS buys the phones at retail cost and loses money on every unit.

In the last couple years someone in RS management sniffed out a bit of a clue, because they started stocking Arduino, RaspberryPi, and most recently LittleBits. A slight correction, but everyone knows RS should be the non-big-box side of Fry's.

Comment: Re:Have you ever used PHP? (Score 1) 245

by Dracos (#48805031) Attached to: PHP vs. Node.js: the Battle For Developer Mind Share

PHP gets bashed because a) the language maintainers are rather bad at language design, and b) so much shitty code gets written in it. I'm in a similar boat as you, having done primarily PHP development since 4.0 was released.

Drupal 7 is ok (I haven't looked at 8 yet), but if you really want to see good PHP code, look at Laravel.

Comment: Re:What about WordPress and SugarCRM or VTiger CRM (Score 1) 245

by Dracos (#48804851) Attached to: PHP vs. Node.js: the Battle For Developer Mind Share

Yes, PHP is easy to write, therefore it is easy to write badly. WordPress is the poster child for PHP's bad reputation, because:

  • It's written badly
  • It's written badly even in the context of PHP4, from which it is a relic
  • The project management refuses to break backwards compatibility

Granted, PHP is the only language where a result like WP is possible. Shitty code hyped by an army of self-described "developers" who proudly and incestuously pass around bad practices like STDs.

That being said, JavaScript outside the browser is a convenient, unnecessary solution looking for a problem.

Each honest calling, each walk of life, has its own elite, its own aristocracy based on excellence of performance. -- James Bryant Conant

Working...