Yes you are right , random sampling has produced loads of desired results, the best money can buy.
With only 1000 samples, you can always try again in short enough time to make press, if you didn't like it the first time.
I'm sure I can trust that you believe you are right because you sat in enough classes to soak up theory about the theoretical, then they gave you a sheepskin. Happens all the time. Personally I blame those with teaching degrees who taught those who wished to teach,etc. until each iteration contaminated by culture, politics and mental health, declined the information to the poo on our plate today.
Lies, damned lies and statistics.
Statistics are barely good for anything and never cover enough criteria and variables to represent accurately, opinion.
Perhaps you should've degreed in information theory.
Sorry, I'm hungover and mean as a rattlesnake today.