Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:Sweet F A (Score 1) 576

If they have starships then they can likely use relativistic weapons. The theory behind these is you accelerate a mass towards a target up to or near light speed (potentially taking many years). This means that the weapon won't be far behind the light front emitted from the weapon, so it is pretty much impossible to detect until very close to impact. And the kinetic energy from such a weapon would have devastating effects on a planet. With such a weapon, there would be no need for any kind of invasion, just kill everything from afar, while staying undetected.

Comment: Re:not complicated...monopology (Score 2) 346

The Swedish model is a lot like the French model - Orange (formerly France telecom) owns all of the last-mile infrastructure, but any provider can use it for their services. So there was a large amount of competition, especially after the company Free came along. So you can get TV, phone (free calling to 100+ countries) and >50Mbps internet for about 30 Euros a month (roughly $40). Now I'm back in the US and I'm getting raped by Comcast for their 'high speed internet' which costs around $100/mo.

Comment: Re:Even higher! (Score 1) 1040

by Dr_Terminus (#47161903) Attached to: Seattle Approves $15 Per Hour Minimum Wage

Actually its been shown that in a slow economy, giving money to idle workers has a stimulating effect on the economy since those workers will spend pretty much all the money they get. With a stronger economy there is more job creation leading to less unemployment and reducing the need for money to be given to idle workers.

Regarding your 'point' of a job, economic value is twofold - first is the worker's contribution to the end product (whatever that may be); second is the worker's participation in the economy by spending the money they make in their job. These two things are inextricably linked to have a functioning economy - without production by workers, there is nothing to buy; without spending by workers, nothing gets sold. So an increase in standard of living can come about two ways - lower prices via higher productivity, or more purchasing power by workers via increase in salary or other means.

Comment: Re:This is the Problem. (Score 1) 246

by Dr_Terminus (#45711423) Attached to: The Business of Attention Deficit Disorder

People in all those countries I listed have equal, affordable access. The UK has the NHS, France has CPAM under Securite Sociale, etc. These countries have strong government intervention setting the prices of healthcare, and as a result, costs are much lower than the US. For example, in France, you can see any public GP for 23€. Then you will be reimbursed 70% of that or 15.10€ of that from CPAM. In the US, I think most people's copay is higher than $30 to see a GP.

Never buy what you do not want because it is cheap; it will be dear to you. -- Thomas Jefferson