Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
For the out-of-band Slashdot experience (mostly headlines), follow us on Twitter, or Facebook. ×

Comment: Re:I'll tell you how- they're turning the internet (Score 1) 194 194

I'll pay $50/month for on demand access to ANY TV program or movie I want, when I want it, with no commercials. The industry doesn't seem to get that yet. So now I use Netflix whenever possible and use...other...means for the things Netflix doesn't have.

Comment: Re:1 thing (Score 1) 583 583

Goes to show you, that even if you fight like a mad dog, you still may be leaving money on the table.

Yep, I really have no way of knowing whether or not customers are bluffing. And buyers know that which is why they ask for discounts anyways. And when they do, I almost always give them at least something.

Some of the accounts I work with are too big to take the risk as long as I still have money left I can give them, and I almost always do. The trick is knowing when to say enough's enough and draw a line in the sand before I'm stuck with a multi million dollar account that consistently loses money.

Comment: Re:1 thing (Score 3, Interesting) 583 583

I'll never know if I would have gotten more money had I gone higher, but that moment of insecurity still bothers me to this day.

You would have, almost certainly. I'm an Estimator, so I'm often in the position of throwing out a price on something. If I give someone a quote and get an e-mail from Sales 10 minutes later saying the customer has accepted it and is placing an order...I know for sure I've left money on the table.

Comment: Re:Many years ago ... (Score 5, Interesting) 211 211

As a result of these norms, it's easier to fire 10% of your workforce then lower all pay by 10%.

I know this may be the exception that proves the rule, but my former company did just that; across the board 10% pay cut to the entire organization, including management. Every one of us hated it, but the smarter of us did realize that it probably saved some peoples' jobs. It had the unintended side effect of taking top performers and encouraging them to perform at 90% (or less), however...

Comment: Re:Google+ failed becuase it's GOOGLE (Score 2) 359 359

I'll second this. Duckduckgo has added many features that I missed from google like image searches and predictive search results. I still use google when duckduckgo doesn't give me what I want, but those instances are getting fewer and further between. I'm probably 95% duckduckgo and 5% google right now.

Comment: Re:Bah ... (Score 1) 99 99

I'd be more or less ok with that in that I was a Charter customer and liked them slightly better than Time Warner (who I have now). They still were overpriced with mediocre customer service, but at least their service was faster and than Time Warner and more reliable.

Of course if they merged, I'm sure it would end up screwing consumers in some way or other...

"Take that, you hostile sons-of-bitches!" -- James Coburn, in the finale of _The_President's_Analyst_