Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:The Slashdot system seems to work pretty well (Score 1) 393

by DeweyQ (#36087542) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Going Beyond Comment Threads?
Consensus over accuracy is one problem. Conflict over accuracy is another. This is a well-known problem in professional journalism today. The "he said, she said" form of "objective" journalism allows for both sides of an issue to be heard, even when one side is a crock of shit. So moderating becomes an even more challenging task than merely allowing minority or fringe opinions to remain.

Rationally, I think the best way to moderate is to allow all polite discourse to continue. If someone gets combative or rude, the quality of the discussion drops, even if they are speaking the utter truth between expletives.

Comment: Instead of a confirmation... (Score 1) 168

by DeweyQ (#35616794) Attached to: Univ. of Illinois Goes War-of-the-Worlds On Students
All the poor souls who are looking down and reading a text while the shooter stalks... How about a "heads up" policy being instituted at the school? Or a directional gunfire analysis certificate mandatory for all students? Or a "Typing Under Pressure" exam followed by a "How to Use the Illi-Alert System" for all shooting alert writers?
The Courts

Analysis of MediaSentry Wins Music-Download Suit 51

Posted by Soulskill
from the somebody-call-jammie dept.
An anonymous reader writes "A Dartmouth professor's analysis of MediaSentry problems helped win a New Hampshire woman's RIAA music-download lawsuit. 'Since all of Plaintiffs' claims are based on the assumption that MediaSentry's software and computer configuration are trustworthy and free of errors, and this log clearly represents a failure of the MediaSentry software to perform the operation it claims to describe, the reliability and validity of the MediaSentry method should be questioned,' wrote professor Sergey Bratus in his report, dated May 30. 'In my opinion, these materials leave critical aspects of MediaSentry's evidence collection process undocumented. In my opinion, they express unwarranted assumptions regarding both software and network technologies involved, and attempt to create an illusion of evidence-supported certainty where it does not exist.'" The full report (PDF) is available online. It's worth noting that this victory was not the outcome of a court ruling; rather, a settlement was reached that did not require the defendant, Mavis Roy, to pay anything to the RIAA.

Comment: Re:It's Too Late, I'm Done with IE (Score 2, Interesting) 524

by DeweyQ (#28389043) Attached to: Microsoft Launches New "Get the Facts" Campaign
I weep for your corporation.

The Web Standards statement is the one that absolutely freaks me out the most. We don't even need to start talking about CSS. We can talk about really really simple stuff like HTML unordered lists. From what I remember in my testing, IE6 (and IE7) displayed them differently than FF, Safari, Opera, and Chrome (lining up the bullets outside the margin of paragraphs above and below). Why?

Comment: Re:That's a nice budget you got there (Score 1) 418

Fair enough. The project management we did on our multi-year projects was ALWAYS bogged down by non-technical, non-requirement issues like management changes and other forms of "pushback". Again, in five years, you can accomplish just about anything, even with the most complex myriad of tax laws and internal "one-off" rules about pay scales. But you can't do anything if there is A) corruption, B) willful resistance, or C) utter lack of stakeholder buy-in. Any one or all three of these seems to be at work here.

And you're totally right that no one who's been on the outside can know anything for sure. /. is all about arrogant claims and wild-ass guessing isn't it?

Comment: Re:That's a nice budget you got there (Score 1) 418

Having said all I did about the outrageous waste of money, a COTS (commercial off-the-shelf) solution, even heavily modified is probably the way to go (and from other comments it sounds like this latest $12 million will go to a Peoplesoft implementation). Still some pretty sweet coin for Accenture, the consulting company that's doing the COTS implementation.

Comment: Re:That's a nice budget you got there (Score 2, Informative) 418

With agile methods and a multi-disciplinary team ("good coders" is an unfortunate catchall phrase I used to mean people who can gather requirements, write user stories, validate, iterate, manage a burndown list, etc.), five years would be absolutely more than enough time to do all of the steps you mention and more... like change management and getting iterations into stakeholder hands early... and on and on. I am neither a youngster nor naive about the software development life cycle (both waterfall which is what it sounds like you're used to, and agile).

Comment: Re:That's a nice budget you got there (Score 1) 418

That's what I was thinking. Four good coders could "do-over" a payroll system in five years no matter how complex it was... at the rates the University is apparently willing to pay and the timeline they have settled for, that is $10 million each for five years of work. Not bad.
Bug

Univ. of Wisconsin's 30-Year-Old Payroll System Needs a $40 Million Fix 418

Posted by timothy
from the too-big-to-not-fail dept.
jaroslav writes "The University of Wisconsin is attempting to update a payroll system they have had in place since 1975, but spent $28.4 million in a 2004 attempt with no results, and now is experiencing new overruns in cost and time after 'not hav[ing] the full picture of how complex this project would be.' The current estimate of the redesign is $12 million and years of further work on top of the money already spent."
Role Playing (Games)

Ubisoft To Shut Down Shadowbane 74

Posted by Soulskill
from the another-one-bites-the-dust dept.
tyen writes "Ubisoft has announced the shutdown of Shadowbane, the first major, fantasy role-playing MMO with true PVP (full asset destruction possible). The shutdown will take place in about two weeks, at the start of May. No official reason has been given by Ubisoft, but running an MMO for free for the past three years, with no significant improvement in market growth during that period, could play a part in the decision. There's been no response from Ubisoft yet on calls to open source the code. "

Comment: Re:This Just In... (Score 1) 328

by DeweyQ (#27509963) Attached to: Google CEO Warns Newspapers Not To Anger Readers
Google itself is not at all sticky. Did you know that in the early days of search, the people in charge of "portal sites" (remember them) like Excite and even Yahoo were trying to figure out ways to keep people on their site. Google took a different approach: the faster people leave our site, the better job we've done of helping them find what they are looking for.

Sometimes a counter-intuitive approach brings a sea change in an industry. But all people are suggesting is that Google will drive traffic to the site and you have to make your site useful so people will want to return. If that means creating an awesome community like /. has done... then so be it. If that means creating really good unique content (with "related" links)... then so be that too.

If you believe that Google-attracted visitors don't ever stick around, then shun Google and figure out a way to attract a stickier audience. But I think the metrics show that if you can retain just a fraction of the massive audience driven to your site from Google, then you'll be doing well.

What this country needs is a dime that will buy a good five-cent bagel.

Working...