Especially when the Westboro Baptists are just trolls. They have no real power.
Last time I checked, accomplices are legally complicit in crimes being committed. Why should any of them be offered any deference when none is given to us plebes?
Especially when the US didn't accept such logic in the Nuremberg Trials. "Just following orders" does not excuse things.
Starving your body tells it to burn muscle, thus increasing your body fat percentage. It's why people who do crash diets have higher body fat percentages when they are done than before they started it because there body burned off lots of their lean body mass.
No one claims they did other than a few ignorants. Hell the technique was being used back in the 19th century as well by Eadweard Muybridge.
It's an exorcize
Someone was possessed by demons?
and actually I find your link way more interesting and informative than TFA.
That's because the article is a fluff piece.
Where did I say Obama's spying was Bush's fault? I responded to a post talking about the 911 attacks. Last time I checked those didn't happen under Obama's regime.
Duh, that was my entire point. The metadata is more valuable to label you as a being part of the boogeyman group de jure and then they will care about the content of your messages.
I said it was okay? Where exactly? Explaining their reasoning does not in any way imply that I think it's okay.
The RIAA has nothing to do with audio formats or their creation/standardization. Also, MP3, AAC, etc. are open formats. One can implement them from publicly-accessible format specs.
Skype has been a "voice chat" program for going on 10 years. And, yes, it was called as such back in 2003.
"Web chatting" has included voice and video for more than a decade.
Since when is WebRTC text-only? From Google's original announcement:
Today, Google made available WebRTC, an open source software package for real-time voice and video on the web that we will be integrating in Chrome.