A team from the Queensland University of Technology in Australia modeled the properties of this DNT and found that the length of the thread doesn’t significantly affect its strength. The results are presented in a paper uploaded toArXiv.
Being part of the TOS generation, and having gone to a few TrekCons back then, when I heard about this it was intriguing to see what they were doing. When I was in university, I was part of an engineering group at school which built a full-scale mockup (fiberglass over a wood frame, if I can remember correctly) of at least one or two segments of the circular bridge, the navigation/weapons console, and the captain's chair. We'd all wear the costumes and horse the set around to TrekCons.
With Star Trek Continues, everything, down to the blinky lights and sound effects, was just like the TOS. However, after a short time I was getting uncomfortable with actors acting the personas acted by other actors. In fact, it apparently creeped me out so much that I had to stop watching, and then watching anything else, even what would normally be other good dramatic series, I saw actors acting like characters, but there was no suspension of belief. It took a few weeks to get over that. Weird.
I like your concept - it's very personal way to deliver the chalkboarded menu to the patrons who can't be there but can't be for whatever reason.
From the camera PoV, I ran into a very similar situation as you. I wanted to grab a shot of the sky every minute, and upload it to Wunderground. I wanted a super-high-resolution image, and a camera that would work well at night. I wanted CCD. I wanted a variety of lenses.I wanted CHEAP. So, on eBay, I found what turned out to be an excellent image quality security IP cam from manufactured by someone called H264DVR. 1920x1280 px. HQ Sony 0.4" CCD. 4, 8 and 12 mm lenses. Had all those useless (at least to me) modes on motion, zones, loss of video, etc. Had tons of tweakation for video parameters (agc, low light, shutter speed, etc). Was in a waterproof outdoor assembly with a big array of IR LEDs for illumination. Was $69 apiece with a lens of your choice, and additional lenses were $7. Took a gamble with 1 and with 8 mm lens.
Arrived. tried it out. Quality of live video astonishingly good for $70. On tripod and aimed at Orion rising, could see easily mag 8 stars in field. Array sensitivity looked very good, and could manually adjust many of the necessary parameters to make a good image. For grabbing a still, spent a few days beating my head against it. Looking on line, found some info on ways typical people and software get images from live IP streams. One was using rstp commands.
Went back to chinese vendor, discovered (with some back and forth) that camera had a completely unmentioned rtsp:// command which was in a format completely different from what the industry uses.
Found software called IP Time Lapse (written by Mike McCormick up in Hew Hampshire) which was rough around the edges but showed some promise in the trial demo of it. Worked with him until we got the camera working well with the software. IPTL uses ffmpeg so I imagine that it could be done by others.
In your case, find the rtsp;// command for grabbing a stream or grabbing a single image. Once you have your single image, you've got what you need!
RPI is a fine school, you'll find plenty of company. Or, find a way into Caltech. JPL is a long way from your 5-hour radius, but you actually have the opportunity as an undergrad to get involved in some cool-ass stuff. JPL is a mechanical engineer's paradise, those of us who are EEs get treated OK %^).
"... and you are exceeding the posted speed on this highway. Your vehicle ID has been logged, and your vehicle is now being rerouted to McDonalds indicated here, "where America is lovin' it", and you will be served with a notice of infraction as well as a discount on a cup of McCoffee (limit one per violator)."
The US DOT Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program has been going on for a very long time. It's taken at least half a decade just to get to the point where there are some practical standards.
It's not your average basement-dwelling Slashdotter's Wi-Fi - this is 802.11p in the 5.9GHz band, the work for which was only completed last year.
Will be licensed restricted access, between vehicles and roadside infrastructure like talking signs and signposts, warning devices, all that happy stuff. Perhaps using multihop, traffic jams and accident scenes could get propagated out to allow motorists to recompute route before becoming mired. No one has figured out how to pay for it or what it will really do. At least in the past, there was talk about commercial organizations subsidizing the infrastructure in return for being able to advertise their service/location on the vehicle's nav system.
Typical deep space comm channels run into the Ka-band spectrum (26-40GHz). The path loss at 32 GHz, between the two stations separated by 50 LY, is an unimaginably large 416dB. Taking the largest fully steerable dish on earth (DSN 70m dish), running at a communications frequency of 32GHz, 400kW transmitter output, and a communications bandwidth that's good enough for 20 word-per-minute Morse code, one could theoretically close the circuit between an identically equipped station 50 LY distant. You could possibly signal somewhere around 300 baud hayes modem speeds circa 1980 if you really worked at it.
Very few medical conditions are caused purely by lifestyle choices...
You'll need to show a little proof here.
On the other hand, "Personal decisions are the leading cause of death", Dr. Ralph L. Keeney of Duke University, 2008
A discussion of his paper, with a variety of points of view, at the Operations Research Forum
And for the rest of us, the Wired article on his paper is here
Nice idea, and one that is auto-ratcheting, with the ultimate effect to drive data volumes down all across the subscriber base. This month, the top 5% get throttled. Next month, the next lower volume tier may now define the top 5%, and that gets throttled. Ultimately, data volumes approach zero, and someone still gets throttled because there's always a top 5% who are the worst. And all along, Verizon can claim it's only the worst bandwidth users getting punished. It's like the system we use here at work to get rid of the low performers... There's always a bottom 10%!
Looks like Mr B has just bought himself a lifetime ticket to that line...
Actually, Bluetooth 3.0 uses IEEE802.11, not Wi-Fi, as the underlying carrier technology. Wi-Fi is a superset of 802.11 features. Wi-Fi brings broad interoperability, higher level functionality and mandated conformance to established standards. BT 3.0 uses 802.11 as an Alternate MAC/PHY (AMP) layer, has a fixed signaling rate of 24Mbps, and does the "networking" using the BT radio and BT protocols, not Wi-Fi. It is not necessary for a 802.11 radio that is set up to run in BT3.0 mode to be compatible with a standard Wi-Fi access point, as BT3.0 is really supposed to be used to allow higher speed data transfer (about 8x) between two BT3.0-enabled devices, like a cameraphone and a notepad. Wi-Fi Direct is direct competition to BT 3.0, but does it more simply with the one radio, technology and protocol rather than two radios and a mix of protocols that are very different and more costly.
As some of you might remember from way back in 2005, originally the high-speed AMP was going to be Ultrawide Band (UWB), but the BTSIG took a bet on the WiMedia Alliance's MB-OFDM quasi-UWB technology and lost when WiMedia folded its tent in early 2009, after probably a dozen manufacturers had failed to get MB-OFDM silicon to work as promoted.
Bluetooth is not gone, in fact BT Classic (the 2.1 stuff) is in the majority of all cellular handsets sold in the world today, and I think each week something like 20 million BT chips are shipped in product, 90++% of that in cellular handsets and headsets. However, the actual usage of BT is pretty low since most people don't really seem to take to headsets, or if they do use a headset, it's often wired since that eliminates the need to charge two batteries. Like I saw somewhere else, BT seems like the IRDA of the 21st Century, ubiquitous yet little used
That having been said, Since 2004 or so I've been using BT headsets (5-6 models now), multiple BT-enabled phones, even a BT-enabled PDA (remember the old Sony Clie), and am generally satisfied by the convenience and performance. Pairing has gotten way better with 2.1, my phone (BB) only forgets about my headset (Jabra) every second week or three, requiring a repairing effort. But I'm an engineer, and have some tolerance for touchy gadgetry... And no, I'm not a member of either the BTSIG or the Wi-Fi Alliance.
Those who claim the dead never return to life haven't ever been around here at quitting time.