Comment: Re:Signing Statement? (Score 1) 301
Who'd have thought Nixon was one of our more honest presidents?
|
|
Who'd have thought Nixon was one of our more honest presidents?
This article has the least comments I've ever seen for an article on the homepage. Only 16 comments after 7+ hours. What's happening with Slashdot??
I actually built a site/app called "CanIStream.It" ( http://www.canistream.it/ ) just because I wanted to get rid of cable, but I didn't want to search across all of the services. Plus I knew movies would eventually get to the service I had (Netflix, Hulu, Amazon) so I built a reminder system into it. Now when I hear about a movie somewhere, I just pull out my (free!) app and tell it to remind me when that movie is out on Netflix/Hulu/Amazon/etc. I don't get to watch everything right away, but at least I know I'll watch it eventually.
Maybe a better plan is for the state to allot the same amount for a defense as they allot for a prosecution. You can still hire your own attorney if you want, but the poor and middle class are far less likely to get overcharged in order to settle. Seems very fair to me, and it keeps prosecutors from bringing BS cases. Might solve all of the problems. Every case is proceeded by a cost, benefit analysis.
There is a "plain site" exception to the FOTPT. If you have a warrant, and while legally pursuing that warrant you find something else, the thing you find is fair game. For instance: If I serve a search warrant to find evidence that you ripped the tags off of your mattresses and when I walk in to the house I see your "grow" operation, I am free to charge you and use the evidence against you.
That's assuming the "force" mentioned above is in the form of a warrant. Otherwise they would not be able to use any of the evidence they found on the computer, including the stuff they were looking for.
FOTPT applies in the instance that your grow room is no where near anyplace that could contain a mattress or anyplace you have to walk through to get to a mattress and the officer goes out of his or her way to look for something other than tags on mattresses. At that point anything they find is off limits and any evidence they get that solely comes from direct knowledge of what they found is FOTPT, and can not be used. IANAL but once upon a time I worked in LE.
Pseudonyms and Anonymous users provide absolute no value to Google. Google isn't a charity, it provides services because of the data it gathers about users for targeted advertising.
Facebook / Twitter / etc also rely on advertising and user information but they don't care about fake information because these fake accounts make their site look good to investors. Google on the other hand actually cares about REAL data, they don't want their algorithms to be soiled with fake data.
Yes,
But do you feel a duty to remain speechless?
If you push the "extra ice" button on the soft drink vending machine, you won't get any ice. If you push the "no ice" button, you'll get ice, but no cup.