Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: This chafes my skivies... (Score 1) 377

by David A. Madore (#1958206) Attached to: Feature:On the Subject of RMS

I think the part of an OS which is most central in defining its identity is not the kernel but the libc. In fact, GNU/Hurd may end up being binary-compatible with GNU/Linux because both use the same (GNU) libc. Isn't that the most important thing, i.e. what name you look for when you have a list of OS choices for a binary package? I suggest the term GNU/ELF :-).

We don't speak of GNU/BSD because BSD has its own ls, cp &al, programs. The GNU programs go in /usr/local/bin under BSD. Whereas Linux is just a kernel, it doesn't come with ls or anything like that, and therefore the GNU tools go in /usr/bin.

Also, I don't think ``what you can't change without rebooting'' is a good definition of ``central''.

The sooner you make your first 5000 mistakes, the sooner you will be able to correct them. -- Nicolaides

Working...