Forgot your password?

Close
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:this is complete BS (Score 1) 938

by Darth Maul (#38360396) Attached to: NTSB Recommends Cell Phone Ban For Drivers

We do have too much punishment before the crime. The real point to all of these laws is to stop people from dying somehow, right? So why not just punish the people to do bad things instead of punishing all the law-abiding citizens? I'm sure it sounds selfish, but I like to think I know when and when not to use a cell phone in a car - so don't tell me when I can and cannot use it. I will make sound judgement. But if I screw up, then by all means punish me then.

But then you threw out that DUI comment - wut. That would be just the same. If people can have a 0.08 blood alcohol level and still drive perfectly, then what's the real problem here?

Comment: Spending cuts - not really (Score 1) 788

by Darth Maul (#36959034) Attached to: Re: the debt deal reached Sunday night ...

At a time where we spend $3.7tril a year, and only take in $2.2, real spending cuts were necessary. Unfortunately, what happened was a typical Washington accounting trick to generate "cuts" out of thin air. Since they were planning on spending $10tril *more* over the next ten years, now they'll only spend $8 tril *more*, therefore that's a $2tril "cut" in spending.

Yay for political math.

Everyone will be shocked when S&P reduces our credit rating anyway (because nothing really changed) and the economy truly crashes next year. "Bbbbut I thought we fixed it!".

Classic Games (Games)

+ - Ethics of selling GPLed software for the iPhone 11

Submitted by
SeanCier
SeanCier writes "We're a small (two-person) iPhone app developer whose first game has recently been released in the app store. In the process, we've inadvertently stepped in it, bringing up a question of the GPL and free software ethics that I'm hoping the Slashdot community can help us clear up, one way or the other.

XPilot, a unique and groundbreaking UNIX-based game from the early/mid nineties, was a classic in its day but was forgotten and has been dead for years, both in terms of use and development. My college roommate and I were addicted to it at the time, even running game servers and publishing custom maps. As it's fully open source (GPLv2), and the iPhone has well over twice the graphics power of the SGI workstations we'd used in college, we decided it was a moral imperative to port it to our cellphones. In the process, we hoped, we could breathe life back into this forgotten classic (not to mention turning a years-old joke into reality). So we did so, and the result was more playable than we'd hoped, despite the physical limitations of the phone. We priced it at $2.99 on the app store (we don't expect it to become the Next Big Thing, but hoped to recoup our costs — such as server charges and Apple's annual $99 developer fee), released the source on our web page, then enthusiastically tracked down every member of the original community we could find to let them know of the hoped-for renaissance.

Which is where things got muddy. After it hit the app store, one of the original developers of XPilot told us he feels adamantly that we're betraying the spirit of the GPL by charging for the app (hopefully he'll chime in with a comment below; I'll leave him anonymous for now to avoid further stepping on toes).

That left us in a terrible spot. We'd thought we were contributing to the community and legacy of this game by reviving it, not stealing from them by charging for it — and didn't think $2.99 was unreasonable (and, again, the source is available for free from our page). It never occurred to us that one of the original creators would feel that we were betraying their contribution. We've discussed the philosophical fine points of free-as-in-speech vs. free-as-in-freedom with him, and have suggested a number of remedies — such as reducing the price (it's now $1.99), profit-sharing with previous contributors, making the game free at some point in the future (once we'd at least recouped our costs), or going "freemium" (offering a fully-functional free version plus a paid version with enhancements we added ourselves, with both GPLed of course). But in each case, the bottom line is that this developer feels the app should be free-as-in-beer period, and anything less is a sleazy betrayal of anybody that made contributions under that license. Which is a shame, because we deeply respect his work on this game and would love for him to be on board with the port — but at the same time this was months' worth of work and we honestly believe we're going about this in a reasonable way.

Obviously one of us has a non-mainstream understanding of open source ethos, but it's become clear we can't come to a consensus on which of us it is, and whether the "spirit of the GPL" allows selling GPLed software (especially when one wasn't the original creator of the software but a more recent contributor). The only way to determine that, it seems, is to poll the open source community itself.

We're determined to do the right thing by the GPL and the community. So here's our plan: we'd like anybody with an opinion on this to vote, and if the community feels that ethically this should be free-as-in-beer, we'll fix it by making it free, end of story. In order to make the vote clear and transparent to all participants, we'll use twitter. Remember, we're not talking about whether it's practical to base a business on GPLed software, nor the best business model for doing so, and certainly not whether the source must be distributed for free (obviously it must be), but just whether charging the binary version of an enhanced/ported version of a GPLed app (while releasing the corresponding source for free) is an ethically defensible thing to do.

If you feel that, ethically, any GPLed app must be given away for $0, include "#xpilot #freeasinbeer" in a tweet.

If you believe a binary version of a GPLed app may be sold with a clear conscience (as long as the source is distributed free of charge), include "#xpilot #freeasinspeech" in a tweet.

We'll count the tweets from unique accounts in one week and behave accordingly."

Comment: Re:Frustrating For Developers (Score 0, Troll) 149

by Darth Maul (#28704127) Attached to: Staying Afloat In a Sea of iPhone Apps

We just got our first app approved, and it took 14 days. But hey, at least it wasn't rejected for some trivial reason like I've read happens to quite a few developers. It does appear somewhat of a black whole where you just wait and wait after rushing and staying up nights to finish - feels very anticlimactic once it's finally approved because you've waited so long. I'm not looking forward to pushing the next update and telling users to "just wait". Shameless plug: XPilot

Games

+ - XPilot for the iPhone->

Submitted by
Sean Cier
Sean Cier writes "If you were a UNIX geek on the internet in the mid nineties, odds are you have fond memories of XPilot, a networked space-fighter game that ran on X and paved the way for many of today's online multiplayer games, with then-groundbreaking features like user-created maps and in-game chat. But what really set it apart was the unique and addictive gameplay, a combination of physics-based space combat and science fiction mayhem, like Asteroids on mind-altering substances.

But the classic was somehow forgotten. Some years ago there was a joke about this workstation-based game being resurrected on cell phones. Well, today the iPhone has easily twice the graphics power of those SGI workstations many of us originally played it on — and now, life imitates humor: XPilot for the iPhone is for sale in the app store.

Oh, and as the original XPilot was open source (GPL), so is the iPhone port; the source is available for free via git."
Link to Original Source

"Whom are you?" said he, for he had been to night school. -- George Ade

Close