Comment: Re:I'm fine... (Score 1) 334
Comment: Re:I'm fine... (Score 1) 334
The upside is I can remember tons and tons of commercial jingles
How is that an upside? I can't really think of a less important thing to remember than a commercial jingle.
Comment: Re:About time (Score 1) 596
Comment: Re:With the expected Chinese requirements. (Score 2) 146
one party != democracy
Agreed.
Say the Chinese communist party were to split into two factions, both deeply committed to communism, but with subtle differences when it comes to implementation details, then all of a sudden you'd have a model democracy, right?
Comment: Re:of course, a little less moving... (Score 1) 566
Comment: Re:Weak sauce (Score 0) 523
Comment: Re:Weak sauce (Score 2, Informative) 523
What were the "atrocities" anyway?
What about committing the supreme international crime, a war of aggression against Iraq?
Is that an "atrocity" enough for you?
+ - The Cause Of Riots And The Price of Food->
Link to Original Source
Comment: Re:It's hard enough to be impartial abot things (Score 1) 333
Hmm, how about Obama?
Well yes, the rich will allow you to climb pretty high, but only as long as you serve their interests.
If you can't beat them, join them, if you can't join them, serve them.
Comment: OK, it's not a bug (Score 4, Funny) 257
Comment: Re:So, if you're simultaneously reading (Score 1) 725
Some guy calls Chomsky a moron, I find that rather moronic (that is, calling Chomsky a moron, not calling someone a moron), so in general terms he exposed himself as a moron by calling someone else a moron, and I put that forth as a nicety. It simply does not follow that I find the act of calling someone a moron moronic per se.
If this supposed contradiction of mine makes you feel better or is somehow comforting, feel free to misunderstand me in any way you see fit.