Meh, I already see more inaccuracy in what I just said.
Here's one more try:

The potential for increasing profits is higher by eliminating used game sales as opposed to eliminating piracy according to a Fable III Dev.

You are right.
Maybe we could rephrase it that way then?

The amount of used game sales has become larger than the amount of pirated copies.

We're running off a backup as we browse!

The conclusion seems misleading.

Misleading conclusion:
Buying a used game doesn't hurt more than pirating the game.

More accurate conclusion:
Companies lose more money to used game sales than to piracy.

Especially when being wiretapped.

Why not? It is customer feedback after all. It is basically saying: I like your company, but I dislike that other company. Please do not do business with them. :(

You presume that the parents are those buying the product. But I believe any 15 years old with the bucks to spare can go into a shop and get out with an iOS enabled device and expose himself with safari without his parents having a chance to monitor anything at all.

So because the iOS device itself isn't considered 17+ the parental controls available in the OS aren't an excuse for Safari avoiding this "warning".

Why then don't I need to be 17 to get myself an iPod and use Safari which presents the same exact risks?

This keyboard is so great that I am now even more likely to forget my sessions open on computers that aren't equipped with it compared with before.

They forgot to mention the software needs to be highly scalable on the amount of personas it can manage.