Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:So live underground (Score 4, Informative) 135

by CycleMan (#49150909) Attached to: Adjusting To a Martian Day More Difficult Than Expected
Interesting. I had read that they adjusted to a 25 hour day, not 30. My source: Richard M. Coleman's book, Wide Awake at 3:00 A.M., page 8, "The results of these sleep-wake cycles shows that most subjects averaged a 25-hour day - that is, left on their own, free from time cues, humans have an internal day length of 25 hours." The problem isn't the Martian day, which is much closer to our natural biorhythms; it is trying to work a Martian time schedule while living on Earth with its time cues.

Comment: Re:Conform or be expelled (Score 3, Interesting) 320

by CycleMan (#48762731) Attached to: HOA Orders TARDIS Removed From In Front of Parrish Home
HOA boards are proof that "for evil men to accomplish their purpose it is only necessary that good men should do nothing." The problem is that most good people would prefer to skimp on their community political engagement and let others deal with the bother of it all... they don't realize the danger of the vacuum that they leave.

Comment: Re:Conform or be expelled (Score 1) 320

by CycleMan (#48762719) Attached to: HOA Orders TARDIS Removed From In Front of Parrish Home
Where I live, townhouses mean you don't have anybody living below or above you, and you have some ownership rights to a patio-sized patch of fenced-in dirt.* Condos mean that dwellings are stacked on top of each other, and the association owns all the dirt.
* You still have to follow HOA rules about what you do with the dirt.

Comment: Re:And? (Score 1) 448

by CycleMan (#48762705) Attached to: Unbundling Cable TV: Be Careful What You Wish For

There is actually quite a lot of competition in the air travel space. About a dozen major national air carriers and over 100 regional and specialty air carriers that do passenger service. I assure you, the cost of airfares are set at what the market will allow. Chances are good that your local cable company or phone company has a monopoly on internet or video services where you are...There is almost certainly not a monopoly on air travel.

Somewhat true. There are limited gates at each airport, so any airline wanting to expand its business at a busy location will have to buy a gate from an airline that holds it today, and if the other one won't sell, too bad. Mergers as well reduce competition: American, Southwest, Delta, and United now serve >85% of the US market. Milwaukee claims to be served by 8 airlines, but it's really 3 plus a few miscellaneous flights.

Comment: Re:And? (Score 1) 448

by CycleMan (#48762661) Attached to: Unbundling Cable TV: Be Careful What You Wish For

However, what's wrong with bringing fewer bags, if you want to, or else paying the going price for the bags you really need?

What I'd like to see is a fee to use the overhead compartment. First checked bag is free; first bag overhead costs you $25. The problem with the process today is that it noticeably slows passenger loading and unloading, because everyone tries to cram all their stuff into overstuffed roller bags, making us feel like a cattle car and enduring multiple announcements of "place your small items at your feet, folks; we offer free gate check; ..." It's why I love that Southwest still includes bags checked for free.

Comment: Re:And? (Score 1) 448

by CycleMan (#48762651) Attached to: Unbundling Cable TV: Be Careful What You Wish For
You make some excellent points about why phones unbundled better than airlines, and the latest cellphone rate wars are a great example of the competition that remains in that arena. Based on this, though, I think cable is more like airlines than cell phones, as cable has a physical presence. I pretty much have two cable providers locally, and it won't make sense price-wise to get some from one and some from the other. Dish/DirectTV offer some hope, and Amazon/Netflix/Hulu offer even more hope, since they can stream nationwide as long as I buy Internet access from someone who won't throttle them. But I wouldn't bet on the pricey channels like ESPN or HBO switching to those folks since they have a good deal with the cable providers today.

Comment: Re:blu rays are cheaper than the movie (Score 1) 400

by CycleMan (#48723121) Attached to: Box Office 2014: Moviegoing Hits Two-Decade Low

...that's nice and all but those old Vaudville houses don't exist anymore. You can be nostalgiac all you want but today you have to deal with the houses that exist. Most of them are crap. Even the bigger ones aren't that impressive compared to a good home theater setup.

I would like to see the home theater setup that can compete with the mighty Wurlitzer organ at the Stanford Theatre. (http://www.stanfordtheatre.org/)

Comment: Re:blu rays are cheaper than the movie (Score 1) 400

by CycleMan (#48723097) Attached to: Box Office 2014: Moviegoing Hits Two-Decade Low

Exactly. And the reason for that is that they want to capture the largest possible audience. Some folks are cheap -- no snacks, thanks -- but the theatres still get their 10% from those folks filling seats. And others want "the experience" whatever it costs, or are taking someone on a date and know that acting cheap will cut off chances of future dates, so they suck it up and pay for whatever. A final group of folks are either aspirational or foolhardy or unable to refuse their children's demands, walking in meaning to be decently frugal but are then lured into buying "just a little something" at the concessions stand.

If they cut concession prices without adjusting ticket prices, they just lose money. Mr. "Experience" is spending less, Mr. Just-a-Little might buy a tad more, and Mr. Cheap probably isn't moved. And if they raise ticket prices to counteract the drop in concession prices, Mr. Just-a-Little might not show and Mr. Cheap definitely skips it, which leaves Mr. "Experience" wondering why he's spending all this to be in an empty or tiny theatre.

Tip for Silicon Valley Mr. Cheaps: the Stanford Theatre shows old-time movies, and you can take a date there, get concessions, and still have change from a $20 bill.

Comment: Re:Are people sick of the MPAA? (Score 1) 400

by CycleMan (#48723059) Attached to: Box Office 2014: Moviegoing Hits Two-Decade Low

The actually experience is different. Amazon reports that as they have grown bigger with more diverse offerings, the top drivers of revenue are shrinking. This is true if one is looking at a category (i.e. books) or as a whole. It looks like everybody has to buy the Harry Potter books, everybody will be buying a ticket to the next Star Wars film, etc.

From my observation, part of the reason for fewer items driving a greater percentage of the revenue is this: given three options for shampoo, I can try each of them and then reliably purchase my favorite. In a large population, we probably differ on what our favorite is. Given a hundred shampoos, once I find one that works decently, I'll stick with it; it's not worth it to me to try 90+ other shampoos. Replace shampoo with movie genre or book author, add in reviewer ratings so that we buy products that are reviewed more than untested and unreviewed products, and that's your Amazon experience.

Comment: Re:Pay-per-minute line (Score 1, Funny) 237

by CycleMan (#48665405) Attached to: The Slow Death of Voice Mail

Land line providers charge extra for long distance.

This is one of the biggest differences between the US and most other places in the world. I'm 36, from the UK, and remember long distance charges on landlines, but only just. Now just about all national calls from a landline are essentially free.

That's partly because the UK is less than the size of one US state, Oregon, whose population is under 4 million persons. You pack more than twice that many persons in London alone. When we say long distance, we mean long distance.

To your credit, when you say "a long time ago," you mean a long time ago.

Comment: Re:More of a proof of concept. (Score 1) 82

by CycleMan (#48464827) Attached to: A Toolbox That Helps Keep You From Losing Tools (Video)
And it's cool for Intel if it gets others thinking, "What could I do with a Galileo or Edison?" Maybe someone puts sensors under his bottles of liquor, to know if anyone has taken them off the shelf temporarily... or a new home security system, helping you confirm that all windows are shut at night... possibilities are endless if you start to think about it.

Comment: Re:Doesn't do enough, IMO (Score 1) 82

by CycleMan (#48464825) Attached to: A Toolbox That Helps Keep You From Losing Tools (Video)
And this box lets you know who it was that didn't put it back, without spending a bunch of time to visually inventory every time it's taken out. (And don't assume visual inventories are perfect either...) My bet is that a production toolbox has more than 6 tools, and I sure as heck don't count all the sockets in my socket set when I pull it out. It's reliable because I'm the only one who uses it. But if I shared it with three other folks working other shifts, how do I expect them to remember, "Which of you used the 10mm socket?"

A mathematician is a device for turning coffee into theorems. -- P. Erdos

Working...