Comment: Just now? (Score 4, Informative) 143
I'm not a Sony fan, but didn't the PS3 come stock with a web browser? I always assumed the 360 did as well. Really MS? It took you this long to put a browser on it?
|
|
I'm not a Sony fan, but didn't the PS3 come stock with a web browser? I always assumed the 360 did as well. Really MS? It took you this long to put a browser on it?
Just because a lawyer had an analogy fail, doesn't mean you get to parrot it and not get mocked for it.
No, you loan your car to someone. Therefore you are responsible. If someone steals your car and crashes into a bus full of nuns, you aren't.
You may be able to make a case that if the person billed for the IP address would be responsible for guests, but if the kid next door is "stealing" internet from you then you shouldn't be.
Its an analogy fail. Get over yourself.
Yep, they were the muscle. They should have known better.
This is true.
visual identification is pretty strong evidence.
Go read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyewitness_identification
Then come back and apologize for making shit up.
But since I know you wont here's a snippet. A quote from a Supreme Court Justice.
Justice Brennan also observed that "At least since United States v. Wade, 388 U. S. 218 (1967), the Court has recognized the inherently suspect qualities of eyewitness identification evidence, and described the evidence as "notoriously unreliable"
Yes, lets let the man who killed a 17 year old whose worse crime ever is possession of pot walk.
I mean Zimmerman has to have his nose clean right? Besides the fact he has been charged on two occasions of resisting arrest, and domestic violence. He must be allowed to walk free.
I may be wrong but from what I understand, they even gave him his gun back.
A man shot a 17 year old. The man weighed more then the 17 y/o by what 100 lbs? The man had a gun and history of violence, The 17 y/o had candy.
HOW THE HELL DO YOU DO THE MENTAL GYMNASTICS TO DETERMINE HE SHOULD WALK FREE WITHOUT FACING A JUDGE?
I don't want the guy strung up. I just want to make sure he faces a judge and jury for these actions.
If someone shoots an unarmed person, until they have been cleared by a court of law, they should be behind bars.
Is that difficult to understand?
Yep, totally credible... not.
I agree, he shouldn't be facing the court of public opinion. He should be facing the court of law. It certainly doesn't look like that is happening.
One meets his destiny often on the road he takes to avoid it.