Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Scumbags (Score 1) 100

by Curtman (#39491657) Attached to: Political Party's Leadership Election Hit By DDoS Attack
I highly doubt the Reformacons are behind this in any official capacity. What could it possibly achieve through a DDoS? They extended the deadline several times to allow the ballots to be cast for each of the 4 rounds of voting. No real harm done other than causing a conflict with Hockey Night in Canada in the 4th round of voting.

If the real issue is that Brian Topp supporters are more likely to be hockey fans than Thomas Mulcair supporters, then lets get to the meat and potatoes of it.

Comment: Re:More disturbingly... (Score 1) 401

The coward speaketh...

embezzling billions in a governement of entitlement

The "billions" was in fact:
"In the end the Commission concluded that $2 million was awarded in contracts without a proper bidding process, $250,000 was added to one contract price for no additional work, and $1.5 million was awarded for work that was never done, of which $1 million had to be repaid. The total cost of the Commission was $14 million." -- (wikipedia cut/paste)

Much less than the money that disappeared over the G20 by the Harperites which was never investigated. Also much less money was misappropriated than the cost of the commission that investigated it.

gun legislation that cost into the billions of dollars

The gun registry cost nothing at all in the end. It would have been profitable had the Harperites not slashed the registration fee to $0. I still pay $30/yr to register my dog by the way. It costs nothing to register a gun.

we would have been better off without out our conservative approach to economics in the last 3 years

Stephen Harper was the one who wanted the banks deregulated while the US was building their bubble. It was a Liberal government that said no, and the resulting loan/mortgage collapse did not happen here. Our banks are the envy of the world because Conservatives were not in power.

Thanks for playing though.

Comment: Re:How it works (Score 1) 247

by Curtman (#35474910) Attached to: The Full Story Behind the Canonical vs. GNOME Drama

People are much more humane to each other once they have met in person.

This is a good point. People are also more receptive to criticism from someone they have met in person too. For some reason in the Gnome community there is this bizarre phenomenon where strange UI decisions are enforced on their users.

<RANT>Think: Spacial Nautilus. It was a terrible idea, nobody liked it except the developers who implemented it. The more users complained about it, the deeper they hid the settings to turn it off. I'm feeling this again with the Gnome 3 beta's. It's extremely hard to get used to this UI, and I wonder why they are trying to turn my desktop computer into a cell phone. For example they have this new "feature" called a hotspot which shuffles your screen into an "overview" mode when you move the mouse to the top left corner of ANY monitor. There are many ways to open the overview, such as clicking the button that is present at the top left corner. The hotspot more times than not happens as I click the button, so that clicking the button actually closes the thing that I wanted open.</RANT>

Its been my impression that things like this are driving the GNOME -vs- Canonical hostility. When Canonical does research to show that its users dislike a feature, they should damn well be able to turn it off on their desktop without pissing off some Gnome developer who thinks it's really really cool.

Comment: Re:Flanagan has recanted (Score 1) 579

by Curtman (#34441824) Attached to: Moscow Has Eyes On WikiLeaks, Too

Summary is false. Flanagan does NOT currently openly advocate assassination of Assange.

He also hasn't been an advisor to Harper for several years. Conservative Party MP, proclaims that she "doesn't know who Tom Flanagan is". I'm usually the first guy to jump in on a Conservative bashing.. But let's not go making stuff up.

Comment: Re:So *that* is how it works... (Score 4, Insightful) 527

by Curtman (#33846484) Attached to: Facebook Billionaire Gives Money To Legalize Marijuana

I don't understand. Are you outraged that this guy spent $50,000 to support Prop 19?

Actually, This guy spent $20 000, and then another $50 000, and another Facebook co-founder spent $100 000. For a total of $170 000.

Marijuana legalization isn't just for the potheads, they already have easy access to pot. It's for the rest of us who are sick and tired of paying billions of dollars to tell people what to do with their own bodies, and are sick of the violence that comes from the black market which prohibition encourages.

Comment: Re:This is a GOOD THING! (Score 1) 383

by Curtman (#33626528) Attached to: In Canada, Criminal Libel Charges Laid For Criticizing Police

If the RCMP can prove that what he claims is false, and for criminal charges the burden surely lies with them (but IANAL), then he deserves what he gets

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Chief admits 5-metre G20 security rule didn't exist
When asked Tuesday if there actually was a five-metre rule given the ministry's clarification, Chief Bill Blair smiled and said, "No, but I was trying to keep the criminals out."

Comment: Re: weapons, explosives and intimidation? (Score 2, Insightful) 392

by Curtman (#32684346) Attached to: Canadian Arrested Over Plans to Test G20 Security
I don't know what he's referring to, but I can give you the story of Crystal Ann Taman, a 40-year-old mother of three

A former Winnipeg police officer was given a conditional sentence of two years less a day Monday for killing a woman in a car accident on the outskirts of the city in 2005.

...

In a deal with prosecutors, Harveymordenzenk pleaded guilty in July to a single charge of dangerous driving causing death in the crash that killed Crystal Ann Taman, a 40-year-old mother of three whose convertible was stopped at a traffic light at the corner of Highway 59 and the Perimeter Highway when it was hit from behind.

Harveymordenzenk was initially charged with refusing a breathalyzer, impaired driving causing death and criminal negligence causing death, but those charges were dropped without explanation when Harveymordenzenk pleaded guilty to dangerous driving.

The court heard that Harveymordenzenk had been out at an after-shift party with off-duty colleagues in the hours before the crash, but no evidence was offered in the case about whether the former officer had been drinking.

One meets his destiny often on the road he takes to avoid it.

Working...