Comment: Re:This is the kind of story that belongs on /. (Score 1) 184
I sort of agree with that. But I don't remember it being all that great. Most of the arguments I remember (and I'll admit I'm guilty of what I'm about to accuse others of) were never-ending piss-fests intended to save face. If somebody defeated you with logic or facts or whatever, your best bet was to find some inaccuracy somewhere in their post, even if off-topic, and point that out Then you could 'win' on that debate. You could defeat a pro-Microsoft post with grammar nazi'ism. I know I've made an ass of myself a few times, I cannot imagine others not remembering it being like that.
I don't really understand why my original post was modded down. If I really did miss some great era of Slashdot history I really would like to know about it. When I think back to 1999-2000, I remember lots of comments about how the Editors were useless, the news was twisted to grab eyeballs, dupe or old stories, and Slashdot was going down-hill. The only real difference I've seen in the last decade was we seem to have way more commentors who are... for lack of a better term... more 'mass-market' than the crowd Slashdot used to attract. I think this corroborates your comment about accusations of people watching Fox news.