Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:They saw this coming for ages... (Score 1) 178

by CrimsonAvenger (#43806447) Attached to: Main US Weather Satellite Fails As Hurricane Season Looms

quite possibly.

We certainly don't have any backups on-orbit if one of the operational GOES sats goes down, having just activated the last of the backups.

Not even sure we have anything in the planning stages yet, much less under construction and/or scheduled to be launched.

Which doesn't excuse a "we won't be able to forecast hurricanes because GOES-13 failed!!!" headline....

Comment: Re:They saw this coming for ages... (Score 2) 178

by CrimsonAvenger (#43806197) Attached to: Main US Weather Satellite Fails As Hurricane Season Looms

To be fair, "making it impossible to predict weather patterns on the East Coast", to me at least, made it sound like GOES-14 was not nearly as ready to take over for GOES-13 as you are saying it is.

True enough. There's no doubt that TFS just screams "we're all gonna die, Die, DIE!"

Which is, alas, all too common these days. Sensationalism FTW....

Comment: Re:They saw this coming for ages... (Score 5, Informative) 178

by CrimsonAvenger (#43805479) Attached to: Main US Weather Satellite Fails As Hurricane Season Looms

Unfortunately, because of Republican intransigence in Congress, they haven't been able to build and launch a new bird.

Didn't read even TFS, I see.

They've already activated the back-up satellite (GOES-14), which has been in orbit waiting for this for four years now (launched in 2009).

Comment: Re: Well duh! (Score 1) 165

by CrimsonAvenger (#43796235) Attached to: EPA Makes a Rad Decision

nor did we take potassium iodide supplements.

How do you know that the Navy wasn't just dumping into your chow?

Due to an injury I suffered once, I was unable to do do my normal job for a couple weeks. During the period, I was detailed as a cook's assistant (which pissed the cook off no end, since he had no more use for a one-armed man than the engineering dept did) - the food came from commercial sources (yeah, we used the same canned foods that you buy in grocery stores, just in job lots), and didn't include any special ingredients (unless you count the occasional bit of cook-spit....)

Comment: Re: Well duh! (Score 1) 165

by CrimsonAvenger (#43796181) Attached to: EPA Makes a Rad Decision

you damn well should have been taking the supplements if you were working anywhere near the reactor. The last thing you want is the thyroid absorbing radioactive isotopes.

You seem to be under the impression that a Naval reactor is a big tub of water filled with fuel rods, that we stirred by hand.

We used what's called a Pressurized Water Reactor. The contamination (those radioisotopes you're so concerned about) stayed in the primary loop, and we stayed outside the reactor compartment (for the most part - I got the majority of the total dosage I received in one night when the job required me to run into the (shutdown) reactor compartment for a couple minutes of every ten minutes all night long).

Comment: Re:Missing option: no outages here. (Score 1) 356

by CrimsonAvenger (#43790013) Attached to: I am fairly prepared for a storm outage of ...

Yes we have storms, typhoons they're called, the bad ones batter the city with 250 km/hr winds for 8-12 hours straight, dumbing in the tune of 500-1000 mm of rain.

Sounds like Katrina.

The underground trains continue service even under those weather conditions.

Alas, can't really do underground trains all that well when the water table is a foot under your yard.

Comment: Re: Well duh! (Score 2) 165

by CrimsonAvenger (#43789549) Attached to: EPA Makes a Rad Decision

It's normal when working in a nuclear plant to be taking potassium iodide on a regular basis, which isn't something that the general populace is likely to be doing. It's also not typical for the general populace to be wearing protective gear either.

Really?

I've never worked civilian nuclear power, but when I was a Navy Nuke, we didn't wear protective gear, nor did we take potassium iodide supplements.

Comment: Re:Missing the point (Score 1) 743

Would be bad that criminals owning guns fire at police or soldiers, after all, so maybe would be nice to add a provision to avoid all people shooting at them.

I'd be willing to bet a lot of criminals would be in favour of interlocks on guns so they couldn't be used to shoot police or soldiers.

Think of the possibilities - steal a cop's uniform (or whatever the key is that the gun uses to determine that the target is a cop), and no gun will fire at you! Brilliant!

Comment: Re:A Better Idea (Score 2) 743

so many gun owners are so lax about safety.

Which, presumably, is why we have upwards of 10,000,000 accidental shootings every year.

Oh, wait, we don't, do we?

Note that the number of accidental shootings we have every year suggests that the number of "lax about safety" gun owners is less than 0.1%....

The bug starts here.

Working...