Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:Obama & Powell (Score 1) 543

by Crazy Eight (#24024615) Attached to: Algorithm Names Powell 'Ideal' Vice President Candidate
I think you're judging the man too harshly. From what I recall, he wasn't credulous -- "I'm not reading this bullshit." If he was merely a passive tool Cheney wouldn't have poked him in the chest while telling him that he could "afford to lose a few points." There comes a point when the rest of ones team wants to go the other way so badly that saying, "This is a mistake." just sounds like, "I'm a traitor." This administration has been especially apt to hear internal criticism that way to boot.
Space

The Impossibility of Colonizing the Galaxy 979

Posted by kdawson
from the let's-settle-the-gobi-desert-first dept.
OriginalArlen writes "The science fiction writer Charlie Stross has written an excellent and comprehensive explanation of why, thousands of SF books, movies, and games notwithstanding, human colonization of other star systems is impossible. Although interstellar colonization seems common-sensical to many, Charlie makes a clear-headed and unarguable case, so far as I can see, that it ain't gonna happen without a 'magic wand' or two. Nevertheless it would be interesting to see reasoned responses from the community who believe that colonization is not merely possible, but inevitable — and even, as Hawking has said, vital for the survival of the species. So, who's right — Hawking or Stross?"

Thrashing is just virtual crashing.

Working...