Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Bummer is, it works (Score -1, Redundant) 340

by Colonel Korn (#40104421) Attached to: When Antivirus Scammers Call the Wrong Guy

Scammers (and spammers) wouldn't do this stuff if it didn't pay off.

I don't think that's true. Let's try it on some other examples.

Serial killers wouldn't do this stuff if it didn't pay off.
Lotto customers wouldn't do this stuff if it didn't pay off.
Beggars wouldn't do this stuff if it didn't pay off.
Antivax zealots wouldn't do this stuff if it didn't pay off.
Snake charmers wouldn't do this stuff if it didn't pay off.
Traditional chinese medicine believers wouldn't wouldn't eat those endangered animal penises if it didn't pay off.
Slashdot first poster trolls wouldn't do this stuff if it didn't pay off.

Comment: Re:CGI wishes (Score 1) 282

by Colonel Korn (#40006877) Attached to: Photographers, You're Being Replaced By Software

All of painting wasn't obsoleted, but photography did greatly reduce the size of the portrait-painting market, which used to be important and lucrative. Rich people paying to have their portraits painted used to be the main way a lot of artists made a living, but that occupation took a real nose-dive in the early 20th century.

This seems intuitively reasonable, but I'm going to stick a big fat "citation needed" here until someone comes back with some numbers. I know some painters who make a tidy business out of portraits today.

Comment: Re:How is this a representative sample? (Score 2) 171

by Colonel Korn (#39955887) Attached to: Why Forbes Says Immigrants Make Better Entrepreneurs

The story dwells on one person's story. There are any number of people (both Americans and immigrants) who take any available job and try to work their way up, but opportunities never appear.

They may as well write a story about a million people who flipped a coin 20 times and the amazing success of the handful who got 20 heads in a row, then give us a guide on how we can live our lives like them. Oh wait, I just described how the entire supposedly merit-based investment banking industry is run.

Comment: Re:Google Drive is better (Score 1) 492

by Colonel Korn (#39908835) Attached to: Is Google the New Microsoft?

Google Drive does have some innovated stuff from Docs - it has awesome realtime collaboration, borrowed from Google Wave. I'd say that if you need several people editing a document at the same time, nothing beats Docs.
The only addition Google made to Docs before rebranding it into Drive is the desktop sync feature and bumping up free storage to 5 gigs. I'd say this is minor compared to existing document editing/viewing/collaboration features, which
a) Dropbox doesn't have;
b) Were steadily developed for at least 5 years.

I think the best and most used feature of Dropbox has been ignored or possibly avoided for patent reasons, by Google and MS: right click to create public link. It's the fastest way the internet has ever had to share a single file and it doesn't require the viewer to have an account with the service. I have a free 25 GB Skydrive and a free 7 GB Google Drive account, but neither gets used because they don't have this critical feature.

Comment: Re:Will they get the same variety there? (Score 1) 234

by Colonel Korn (#39815421) Attached to: Apple Planning To Build Private Restaurant

Pretty sure it's not hard to start a restaurant that beats a bunch of mega-chain sandwich shops and burrito joints. And seriously, you consider the above options "variety"? You need to seriously expand your lunch selection.

Jeez, even the Google cafeteria has 10x the "variety" of those places, and Apple passed Google in absurd cash flow a while ago...

Google's cafeterias have more variety than any one of those megachains, but the point was that employees have a choice between thousands of nearby restaurants that collectively have far more variety than a central cafeteria. Furthermore, in terms of quality I think Google's cafeterias are on par with a place like subway and well behind halfway decent places like Panera and Chipotle, not to mention the really good local restaurants.

Comment: Re:Mixed bag compared to Dropbox (Score 1) 323

by Colonel Korn (#39785211) Attached to: Google Drive Goes Live

Versions count against your storage, trash counts against your storage, Google Docs files do not, shared files do not.

No right-click menu in the desktop client, so no grabbing public links etc.

I installed SkyDrive yesterday because of the recent update and the recent free 25 GB upgrade, but it also lacks the right click functionality in the desktop client so I'm on the verge of just going back to Dropbox. Based on what people such as yourself are saying about Google Drive, it looks like it's even slightly worse than SkyDrive. I wonder whether Google and MS are avoiding the right click public link feature because of a Dropbox patent or whether neither company believes it's useful.

Comment: Re:Zuckerberg == rich idiot (Score 5, Insightful) 738

Nope. Facebook is doing the exact same thing as every other large tech company: Microsoft, Google, Oracle, etc. (Facebook also has a lot of silicon valley vets, Zuckerberg isn't just making this stuff up as he goes.)

The idea is that you hire "raw material" (CS grads) who really don't know any engineering. Then you train them in the Company Way. Because they don't know any better, they're now bound to the company's internal processes and it makes it that much harder for them to jump-ship or work on someone else's ecosystem. They also don't get uppity and say "Let's write this in Java" or "Oracle DB does this, why are we recreating it?"

Facebook uses PHP as their internal language and the majority of CS-wonk new hires have never even used it. This is 100% by-design.

And Facebook, which is based around a successful idea and very simple code, has been plagued by poor programming since it went live.

Comment: Re:The Department of Redundancy Department (Score 1) 628

Uh, no... Physics is to Mechanical Engineering as Chemistry is to Chemical Engineering as Computer Science is to Computer Engineering.

Science is very, very different from engineering. Science is focused on the theoretical, while engineering is focused on applying that theory to the real world, subject to various resource constraints.

Given that they are so different, it makes absolutely no sense to try to group them together, especially in some attempt to "save money".

The conclusion may or may not be valid, but the assertion that science is "very, very different" from engineering is quite false, especially when you look at research done in chemistry vs. chemical engineering departments and see that the overlap is immense.

VICARIOUSLY experience some reason to LIVE!!

Working...