You haven't complained about Unicode or beta recently.
Show me another MILF with an IQ of 80 who has inculcated herself as one of the highest paid cheerleaders of all time.
It's also depressing, but you didn't ask about that.
Critical thinking skills aren't that hard to pick up on the side while you're earning a STEM degree
You must be new here.
It is this. EMAIL IS NOT SECURE. No matter who starts it or finishes it.
If you are using email to do anything but send words of affection to your legally bound, opposite sex, partner (or recipes to anyone), you're doing it wrong.
Remember the bit about email being a postcard?
Its a simple bash command to fix this: gsettings set com.canonical.Unity.Lenses disabled-scopes "['more_suggestions-amazon.scope', 'more_suggestions-u1ms.scope', 'more_suggestions-populartracks.scope', 'music-musicstore.scope', 'more_suggestions-ebay.scope', 'more_suggestions-ubuntushop.scope', 'more_suggestions-skimlinks.scope']"
I don't think that word means what you think it means.
It IS overblown. But then again, so is pretty much everything around here.
It IS important to render garments and gnash teeth over stuff like this. Else Apple (and others) will try this again. Besides, what else are we going to do here? Solve the major problems of the world?
Pretty high flying if you ask me.
Apple gets nailed because it's a walled garden and the user is insulated from making choices.
Apple gets nailed because they didn't give the user a choice.
I suppose it sucks to be Apple.
All the way to the bank.
Yep, Robert Heinlein meets Barney.
They just call global warming skeptics "deniers and "morons," because it's so much easier than trying to explain why why there's been no warming for 19 years, in violation of all global warming models.
Global warming is no longer theory, it's a religion, as well a mechanism for the transnational left to transfer power and money from individuals to national and transnational governments.
Global warming no longer has anything to do with science; it's a faith-based doctrine.
It most certainly is so much easier to call you a denier and a moron because we have gone over this little issue about 10E4 times and you still hold on to your infantile view of the process (study of short term temperature fluctuations either prove or invalidate anthropomorphic climate change (ACC)). The data behind ACC is robust and, unfortunately for you, complex.
IF you inadvertently live in a "danger" zone THEN you should plan on moving sometime in the next 200-300 years just to be safe.
If you are really risk adverse, change the eval period from 10k years to 100k years and relocate at least half the distance to your desired position in the next 50 years.
I thought they already announced it. Even added a free cell phone radio!
Oh, you aren't trapped. You simply have failed to recognize this as a sign from St. Jobs that your tithing is becoming a bit stingy for a fine, upstanding member of the Cult of Apple.
Free yourself from your shackles! Bask in the Glorious Light of a Retina Display (on certain models), of towers that can be confused with an ashtray, of connectors used by no one else on the planet. Of operating systems with the lifespan of a midge fly.
Or, you can be doomed forever in the Pit of Financial Sobriety.
The choice is yours. Upgrade or die.
IIRC they were laser sintering some exhaust nozzles. So yes, it is a technology that can be added to our bag of Homo Industrialis tricks. No, it's not going to replace much in the manufacturing sector anytime soon.
Consider this - suppose the investigator was looking for a fleeing prisoner and used binoculars to search as he traveled through the city. While engaged in that search he saw a robbery in progress through the binoculars and called the city police to make the arrest. Would he have violated the law by making that search? Should there be a legal difference between searches by photon versus those by electron?
Nope, bad analogy. Try a car chase or something....
The binocular search is in the public view. The computer search goes into private territory. The better analogy in your case would be if the investigator had to enter someone's house (without a warrant) to view a potential crime. Can't do that.